37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 756190 |
Time | |
Date | 200710 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | msl single value : 10000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Weather Elements | Fog |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : zzz.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Amateur (Home) Built |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground : parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 25 flight time total : 1100 flight time type : 380 |
ASRS Report | 756190 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : declared emergency flight crew : landed in emergency condition |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft Weather |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
In cruise flight at 10000 ft; the fuel flow from a tank containing 70 gallons of jet a refused to flow and resulted in a low fuel warning from the header tank. With the lack of fuel flow; it gives about 15 mins of fuel to land. I declared a fuel related emergency and flew an emergency ILS approach into ZZZ in low IFR conditions. The flight was never in any danger as long as I landed within 15 mins. A gas cap seal was found to have partially unseated and resulted in a venting problem for that tank. It has been rectified. The low IMC was contributing to the difficulty of the situation and the inability to continue flight without implementing a corrective action. All approach charts and en route left charts were on board and current; the controller was impeccable in her assistance to getting me quickly onto the approach and an uneventful outcome. After corrective action; the rest of the flight was conducted safely after the WX conditions improved. This was the first emergency I have ever declared and chose to declare it due to the difficult WX conditions that might have caused a missed approach and a different outcome. If I was in VMC; I would have made a quick landing under visual conditions and not needed to declare an emergency.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: HOME BUILT TURBO PROP MAKES EMERGENCY LNDG WHEN PLT IS UNABLE TO ACCESS FUEL IN TANK WITH MALFUNCTIONING VENTING SYSTEM.
Narrative: IN CRUISE FLT AT 10000 FT; THE FUEL FLOW FROM A TANK CONTAINING 70 GALLONS OF JET A REFUSED TO FLOW AND RESULTED IN A LOW FUEL WARNING FROM THE HEADER TANK. WITH THE LACK OF FUEL FLOW; IT GIVES ABOUT 15 MINS OF FUEL TO LAND. I DECLARED A FUEL RELATED EMER AND FLEW AN EMER ILS APCH INTO ZZZ IN LOW IFR CONDITIONS. THE FLT WAS NEVER IN ANY DANGER AS LONG AS I LANDED WITHIN 15 MINS. A GAS CAP SEAL WAS FOUND TO HAVE PARTIALLY UNSEATED AND RESULTED IN A VENTING PROB FOR THAT TANK. IT HAS BEEN RECTIFIED. THE LOW IMC WAS CONTRIBUTING TO THE DIFFICULTY OF THE SITUATION AND THE INABILITY TO CONTINUE FLT WITHOUT IMPLEMENTING A CORRECTIVE ACTION. ALL APCH CHARTS AND ENRTE L CHARTS WERE ON BOARD AND CURRENT; THE CTLR WAS IMPECCABLE IN HER ASSISTANCE TO GETTING ME QUICKLY ONTO THE APCH AND AN UNEVENTFUL OUTCOME. AFTER CORRECTIVE ACTION; THE REST OF THE FLT WAS CONDUCTED SAFELY AFTER THE WX CONDITIONS IMPROVED. THIS WAS THE FIRST EMER I HAVE EVER DECLARED AND CHOSE TO DECLARE IT DUE TO THE DIFFICULT WX CONDITIONS THAT MIGHT HAVE CAUSED A MISSED APCH AND A DIFFERENT OUTCOME. IF I WAS IN VMC; I WOULD HAVE MADE A QUICK LNDG UNDER VISUAL CONDITIONS AND NOT NEEDED TO DECLARE AN EMER.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.