37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 756810 |
Time | |
Date | 200710 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-500 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 120 flight time total : 11000 flight time type : 6000 |
ASRS Report | 756810 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | aircraft : equipment problem dissipated other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Chart Or Publication Maintenance Human Performance Company |
Primary Problem | Chart Or Publication |
Narrative:
Aircraft had #2 engine B fire loop deferred. Except for the first flight of the day; it is not a requirement to do a fire test; however as a precautionary measure I elected to verify the remaining system was still functioning. I discovered both loops to be inoperative and contacted maintenance to discover this is a chronic item and the log history indicated 499 hours of problems. As a captain and safety advocate; I find this to be unacceptable and another example of the company's reactive maintenance process. After resetting the circuit breaker and cycling the system selector switch several times; the a loop returned to normal operating status. Maintenance elected to sign off the aircraft after we tested and retested the system many times; ensuring that it was functioning properly. We operated the flight 1.5 hours late; with the agreement the airplane would be removed from service and repaired once and for all. As another safety measure; I elected to place our jump seater in a window seat next to the #2 engine; to act as an observer. I am concerned with our current maintenance procedures and the fact the MEL does not require the remaining fire system to be tested prior to each departure; knowing 1 loop is already deferred.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-500 WAS DISPATCHED WITH ONE ENG FIRE LOOP DEFERRED. CAPT DISCOVERED THAT OTHER LOOP WAS ALSO INOP.
Narrative: ACFT HAD #2 ENG B FIRE LOOP DEFERRED. EXCEPT FOR THE FIRST FLT OF THE DAY; IT IS NOT A REQUIREMENT TO DO A FIRE TEST; HOWEVER AS A PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE I ELECTED TO VERIFY THE REMAINING SYS WAS STILL FUNCTIONING. I DISCOVERED BOTH LOOPS TO BE INOP AND CONTACTED MAINT TO DISCOVER THIS IS A CHRONIC ITEM AND THE LOG HISTORY INDICATED 499 HRS OF PROBS. AS A CAPT AND SAFETY ADVOCATE; I FIND THIS TO BE UNACCEPTABLE AND ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE COMPANY'S REACTIVE MAINT PROCESS. AFTER RESETTING THE CIRCUIT BREAKER AND CYCLING THE SYS SELECTOR SWITCH SEVERAL TIMES; THE A LOOP RETURNED TO NORMAL OPERATING STATUS. MAINT ELECTED TO SIGN OFF THE ACFT AFTER WE TESTED AND RETESTED THE SYS MANY TIMES; ENSURING THAT IT WAS FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. WE OPERATED THE FLT 1.5 HRS LATE; WITH THE AGREEMENT THE AIRPLANE WOULD BE REMOVED FROM SVC AND REPAIRED ONCE AND FOR ALL. AS ANOTHER SAFETY MEASURE; I ELECTED TO PLACE OUR JUMP SEATER IN A WINDOW SEAT NEXT TO THE #2 ENG; TO ACT AS AN OBSERVER. I AM CONCERNED WITH OUR CURRENT MAINT PROCS AND THE FACT THE MEL DOES NOT REQUIRE THE REMAINING FIRE SYS TO BE TESTED PRIOR TO EACH DEP; KNOWING 1 LOOP IS ALREADY DEFERRED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.