37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 757115 |
Time | |
Date | 200710 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : atl.airport |
State Reference | GA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Marginal |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : a80.tracon |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach controller : radar |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller radar : 22 controller time certified in position1 : 18 |
ASRS Report | 757115 |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Navigational Facility FAA |
Primary Problem | FAA |
Narrative:
Atl landing east; with triple ILS prm approachs in use. All 3 finals were busy. I was working the prm monitor when the approach supervisor came to us and pointed out an aircraft that was not displayed on our scopes; but was flying erratically through all 3 finals at a high rate of speed (up to 180 KTS) with a mode C that indicated anywhere from below 2000 ft to above 23000 ft. The aircraft circled around and flew right at other aircraft without our having any idea of his actual altitude or intentions. At first the aircraft appeared to have crash landed west of atl; but a few mins later; one of the pilots reported a high wing aircraft circling a couple hundred ft above the treetops. The aircraft target was never displayed on any of the 3 prm displays. The prm scopes were completely useless in this situation. As far as I know; no record was kept of this incident. Without sounding a little paranoid; what if this pilot had some bad intentions? At the very least; the pilot flew through 3 finals full of aircraft without any repercussions. I don't believe the FAA is fulfilling its safety critical mission by having controllers use a piece of equipment that doesn't display primary targets. Without these targets being displayed; controllers cannot provide traffic information to the pilots on unknown targets flying through the finals.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A80 CTLR VOICED CONCERN REGARDING PRM LIMITATIONS; IE; NOT ABLE TO DISPLAY PRIMARY RADAR TARGETS; SECONDARY ONLY.
Narrative: ATL LNDG E; WITH TRIPLE ILS PRM APCHS IN USE. ALL 3 FINALS WERE BUSY. I WAS WORKING THE PRM MONITOR WHEN THE APCH SUPVR CAME TO US AND POINTED OUT AN ACFT THAT WAS NOT DISPLAYED ON OUR SCOPES; BUT WAS FLYING ERRATICALLY THROUGH ALL 3 FINALS AT A HIGH RATE OF SPD (UP TO 180 KTS) WITH A MODE C THAT INDICATED ANYWHERE FROM BELOW 2000 FT TO ABOVE 23000 FT. THE ACFT CIRCLED AROUND AND FLEW RIGHT AT OTHER ACFT WITHOUT OUR HAVING ANY IDEA OF HIS ACTUAL ALT OR INTENTIONS. AT FIRST THE ACFT APPEARED TO HAVE CRASH LANDED W OF ATL; BUT A FEW MINS LATER; ONE OF THE PLTS RPTED A HIGH WING ACFT CIRCLING A COUPLE HUNDRED FT ABOVE THE TREETOPS. THE ACFT TARGET WAS NEVER DISPLAYED ON ANY OF THE 3 PRM DISPLAYS. THE PRM SCOPES WERE COMPLETELY USELESS IN THIS SITUATION. AS FAR AS I KNOW; NO RECORD WAS KEPT OF THIS INCIDENT. WITHOUT SOUNDING A LITTLE PARANOID; WHAT IF THIS PLT HAD SOME BAD INTENTIONS? AT THE VERY LEAST; THE PLT FLEW THROUGH 3 FINALS FULL OF ACFT WITHOUT ANY REPERCUSSIONS. I DON'T BELIEVE THE FAA IS FULFILLING ITS SAFETY CRITICAL MISSION BY HAVING CTLRS USE A PIECE OF EQUIP THAT DOESN'T DISPLAY PRIMARY TARGETS. WITHOUT THESE TARGETS BEING DISPLAYED; CTLRS CANNOT PROVIDE TFC INFO TO THE PLTS ON UNKNOWN TARGETS FLYING THROUGH THE FINALS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.