37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 760468 |
Time | |
Date | 200711 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001 To 0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lih.airport |
State Reference | HI |
Altitude | msl single value : 10000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : lih.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 15000 flight time type : 400 |
ASRS Report | 760468 |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : diverted to another airport flight crew : executed missed approach |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Company Weather |
Primary Problem | Weather |
Narrative:
Flight to lih. Had overburn; plus significant wind bust; still showed landing lih with 6.0 fuel. ATIS advertised 5 mi and 1200 ft broken. Flew VOR runway 21 approach to minimums to a missed approach due to rain showers and poor visibility. Flew straight to hnl and blocked in with 2.6 fuel (we had added 1.0 cleared fuel). Many contributing factors: wrong burn rate for aircraft; flight plan planned at mach .77; winds more than double forecast in some areas; ATIS at arrival inaccurate; bad arrival forecast for lih (no alternate). I am done planning minimum fuel at arrival to save the company money. It isn't safe. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter stated that mach .77 flight plan was slower than usual; which did not allow for adjusting cruise speed to conserve fuel. When winds were discovered to be less favorable during cruise; landing fuel was still projected at approximately one hour fuel remaining at touchdown. Even though the ATIS for arrival indicated 5 miles visibility; a rain shower prevented the flight crew from obtaining visual contact with the airport; so the flight crew diverted to hnl. An alternate was not planned for the destination; and the cleared fuel was based upon having sufficient fuel onboard at the pet. The flight crew declared min fuel; and they landed with approximately 25 min fuel remaining.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B757-200 OVERWATER FLT EXECUTED MISSED APCH DUE TO POOR VISIBILITY AT DEST; AND THE FLT CREW DIVERTED. FLT LANDED WITH 25 MIN FUEL REMAINING.
Narrative: FLT TO LIH. HAD OVERBURN; PLUS SIGNIFICANT WIND BUST; STILL SHOWED LNDG LIH WITH 6.0 FUEL. ATIS ADVERTISED 5 MI AND 1200 FT BROKEN. FLEW VOR RWY 21 APCH TO MINIMUMS TO A MISSED APCH DUE TO RAIN SHOWERS AND POOR VISIBILITY. FLEW STRAIGHT TO HNL AND BLOCKED IN WITH 2.6 FUEL (WE HAD ADDED 1.0 CLRED FUEL). MANY CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: WRONG BURN RATE FOR ACFT; FLT PLAN PLANNED AT MACH .77; WINDS MORE THAN DOUBLE FORECAST IN SOME AREAS; ATIS AT ARR INACCURATE; BAD ARR FORECAST FOR LIH (NO ALTERNATE). I AM DONE PLANNING MINIMUM FUEL AT ARR TO SAVE THE COMPANY MONEY. IT ISN'T SAFE. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: REPORTER STATED THAT MACH .77 FLT PLAN WAS SLOWER THAN USUAL; WHICH DID NOT ALLOW FOR ADJUSTING CRUISE SPEED TO CONSERVE FUEL. WHEN WINDS WERE DISCOVERED TO BE LESS FAVORABLE DURING CRUISE; LANDING FUEL WAS STILL PROJECTED AT APPROX ONE HOUR FUEL REMAINING AT TOUCHDOWN. EVEN THOUGH THE ATIS FOR ARRIVAL INDICATED 5 MILES VISIBILITY; A RAIN SHOWER PREVENTED THE FLT CREW FROM OBTAINING VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE ARPT; SO THE FLT CREW DIVERTED TO HNL. AN ALTERNATE WAS NOT PLANNED FOR THE DEST; AND THE CLEARED FUEL WAS BASED UPON HAVING SUFFICIENT FUEL ONBOARD AT THE PET. THE FLT CREW DECLARED MIN FUEL; AND THEY LANDED WITH APPROXIMATELY 25 MIN FUEL REMAINING.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.