 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
An air carrier crew received a last minute takeoff change to cle runway 24C but the crew flew the oberln SID applicable to runway 24R; their original departure runway.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 760472 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200711 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : cle.airport |
| State Reference | OH |
| Altitude | msl single value : 23000 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | artcc : zob.artcc |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet 700 ER&LR |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Navigation In Use | other |
| Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
| Route In Use | departure sid : oberln |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| ASRS Report | 760472 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| ASRS Report | 760603 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
During phase of preparation for takeoff from cle; we planned to depart runway 24R; via the oberln RNAV SID. At last min; tower changed our runway to runway 24C; which we loaded into FMS. On departure; they cleared us direct brunz; which we did; then later vectored us onto headings for traffic saturation. We then were given a heading. We as a crew noticed a discontinuity in the flight plan due to the fact that the oberln SID is runway dependent; and not applicable to a runway 24C departure. We reloaded the SID; with further downstream waypoints along the flight plan; and afterwards proceeded to ZZZ. ATC at one point did ask us if we were aware as to why we were assigned various headings to fly. We responded; traffic; as that was what was indicated to us by a previous controller prior to a handoff. Confirming any runway changes last min that; being runway dependent; might not contain a filed and cleared SID from a changed runway.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN ACR CREW RECEIVED A LAST MINUTE TKOF CHANGE TO CLE RWY 24C BUT THE CREW FLEW THE OBERLN SID APPLICABLE TO RWY 24R; THEIR ORIGINAL DEPARTURE RWY.
Narrative: DURING PHASE OF PREPARATION FOR TKOF FROM CLE; WE PLANNED TO DEPART RWY 24R; VIA THE OBERLN RNAV SID. AT LAST MIN; TWR CHANGED OUR RWY TO RWY 24C; WHICH WE LOADED INTO FMS. ON DEP; THEY CLRED US DIRECT BRUNZ; WHICH WE DID; THEN LATER VECTORED US ONTO HDGS FOR TFC SATURATION. WE THEN WERE GIVEN A HDG. WE AS A CREW NOTICED A DISCONTINUITY IN THE FLT PLAN DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE OBERLN SID IS RWY DEPENDENT; AND NOT APPLICABLE TO A RWY 24C DEP. WE RELOADED THE SID; WITH FURTHER DOWNSTREAM WAYPOINTS ALONG THE FLT PLAN; AND AFTERWARDS PROCEEDED TO ZZZ. ATC AT ONE POINT DID ASK US IF WE WERE AWARE AS TO WHY WE WERE ASSIGNED VARIOUS HDGS TO FLY. WE RESPONDED; TFC; AS THAT WAS WHAT WAS INDICATED TO US BY A PREVIOUS CTLR PRIOR TO A HDOF. CONFIRMING ANY RWY CHANGES LAST MIN THAT; BEING RWY DEPENDENT; MIGHT NOT CONTAIN A FILED AND CLRED SID FROM A CHANGED RWY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.