37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 762150 |
Time | |
Date | 200711 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : gjt.airport |
State Reference | CO |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | landing : roll |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 270 flight time total : 10100 flight time type : 5100 |
ASRS Report | 762150 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 220 flight time total : 1200 flight time type : 950 |
ASRS Report | 762856 |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway non adherence : clearance |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
Approach cleared us to land on runway 29; switched to tower and was cleared to land runway 29 left base entry. On final for runway 29 my first officer asked which runway I was setting up for. I said runway 29 and he said it was the other one. We were in a position to land on the other runway 22; but I didn't have time to look without going around and reentering. Winds were calm with no traffic conflicts. Runways 22 and 29 at gjt come together at a point and on the airport diagram the numbers are listed close together. I thought that I must have looked at it wrong and ended up landing on runway 22. Supplemental information from acn 762856: flying into grand junction; approach cleared us for the visual runway 29. I read back cleared visual runway 29. We switched over to tower control and tower told us left base runway 29 clear to land. I read back that information correctly. The captain who was flying set up correctly for a left base runway 29. I looked down at my airport diagram and got confused. The runway numbers on the chart are real close together. I thought we were set up on the wrong runway so I told the captain so. He trusted me and turned final for runway 22 instead of runway 29. We safely landed and tower made us aware of our mistake. No other planes were in the area and safety was never an issue. If I had read the airport diagram correctly there never would have been an issue.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CRJ200 FLT CREW REPORTS CONFUSION DURING VISUAL APPROACH TO RWY 29 AT GJT AND LANDS ON RWY 22.
Narrative: APCH CLRED US TO LAND ON RWY 29; SWITCHED TO TWR AND WAS CLRED TO LAND RWY 29 L BASE ENTRY. ON FINAL FOR RWY 29 MY FO ASKED WHICH RWY I WAS SETTING UP FOR. I SAID RWY 29 AND HE SAID IT WAS THE OTHER ONE. WE WERE IN A POS TO LAND ON THE OTHER RWY 22; BUT I DIDN'T HAVE TIME TO LOOK WITHOUT GOING AROUND AND REENTERING. WINDS WERE CALM WITH NO TFC CONFLICTS. RWYS 22 AND 29 AT GJT COME TOGETHER AT A POINT AND ON THE ARPT DIAGRAM THE NUMBERS ARE LISTED CLOSE TOGETHER. I THOUGHT THAT I MUST HAVE LOOKED AT IT WRONG AND ENDED UP LNDG ON RWY 22. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 762856: FLYING INTO GRAND JUNCTION; APCH CLRED US FOR THE VISUAL RWY 29. I READ BACK CLRED VISUAL RWY 29. WE SWITCHED OVER TO TWR CTL AND TWR TOLD US L BASE RWY 29 CLR TO LAND. I READ BACK THAT INFO CORRECTLY. THE CAPT WHO WAS FLYING SET UP CORRECTLY FOR A L BASE RWY 29. I LOOKED DOWN AT MY ARPT DIAGRAM AND GOT CONFUSED. THE RWY NUMBERS ON THE CHART ARE REAL CLOSE TOGETHER. I THOUGHT WE WERE SET UP ON THE WRONG RWY SO I TOLD THE CAPT SO. HE TRUSTED ME AND TURNED FINAL FOR RWY 22 INSTEAD OF RWY 29. WE SAFELY LANDED AND TWR MADE US AWARE OF OUR MISTAKE. NO OTHER PLANES WERE IN THE AREA AND SAFETY WAS NEVER AN ISSUE. IF I HAD READ THE ARPT DIAGRAM CORRECTLY THERE NEVER WOULD HAVE BEEN AN ISSUE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.