37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 787539 |
Time | |
Date | 200805 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : pushback |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
ASRS Report | 787539 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe maintenance problem : improper maintenance non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course |
Consequence | other other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : briefing performance deficiency : installation performance deficiency : logbook entry performance deficiency : testing performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
During pushback; we started the left engine. I noted the sound of the left generator coming on line; yet the volt and frequency meters were full scale left (no indication). Since I heard the generator come on line; I moved the selector switch to APU to see if the frequency and voltage gauges indicated for the APU. They did not. We called maintenance and they wanted me to check the MEL for generator indication. I told them the gauges didn't indicate for the engine generator or the APU generator and also that something didn't look right with the gauges (more on this later). During this discussion we were asked to taxi forward for traffic in the alley. Eventually; I convinced maintenance we should return to the gate. We taxied across the alley. There was no external power and no cart available. After about 1 hour of troubleshooting; the flight was canceled. Our next leg was later that day. We were assigned the same aircraft from above. After talking to one of the mechanics that had worked the problem; and after reading the logbook; we discovered that the voltage gauge had been previously replaced with a load meter gauge by mistake. This is why something didn't look right with the gauges. On engine start; the wrong gauge caused the selector switch to burn out which caused circuit breaker L-22 (left voltmeter) and circuit breaker L-24 (APU voltmeter) to trip. This gauge had been previously replaced 3 days prior to this event due to an integral lighting write-up. The next leg in this aircraft was completed with no abnormalities.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN MD-80 CAPTAIN AND MECHANIC DISCOVERED THAT A VOLTAGE GAUGE WAS INADVERTENTLY REPLACED THREE DAYS EARLIER WITH A LOAD METER GAUGE. THIS CAUSED THE SELECTOR SWITCH TO BURN OUT; TRIPPING TWO CIRCUIT BREAKERS.
Narrative: DURING PUSHBACK; WE STARTED THE L ENG. I NOTED THE SOUND OF THE L GENERATOR COMING ON LINE; YET THE VOLT AND FREQ METERS WERE FULL SCALE L (NO INDICATION). SINCE I HEARD THE GENERATOR COME ON LINE; I MOVED THE SELECTOR SWITCH TO APU TO SEE IF THE FREQ AND VOLTAGE GAUGES INDICATED FOR THE APU. THEY DID NOT. WE CALLED MAINT AND THEY WANTED ME TO CHK THE MEL FOR GENERATOR INDICATION. I TOLD THEM THE GAUGES DIDN'T INDICATE FOR THE ENG GENERATOR OR THE APU GENERATOR AND ALSO THAT SOMETHING DIDN'T LOOK RIGHT WITH THE GAUGES (MORE ON THIS LATER). DURING THIS DISCUSSION WE WERE ASKED TO TAXI FORWARD FOR TFC IN THE ALLEY. EVENTUALLY; I CONVINCED MAINT WE SHOULD RETURN TO THE GATE. WE TAXIED ACROSS THE ALLEY. THERE WAS NO EXTERNAL PWR AND NO CART AVAILABLE. AFTER ABOUT 1 HR OF TROUBLESHOOTING; THE FLT WAS CANCELED. OUR NEXT LEG WAS LATER THAT DAY. WE WERE ASSIGNED THE SAME ACFT FROM ABOVE. AFTER TALKING TO ONE OF THE MECHS THAT HAD WORKED THE PROB; AND AFTER READING THE LOGBOOK; WE DISCOVERED THAT THE VOLTAGE GAUGE HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY REPLACED WITH A LOAD METER GAUGE BY MISTAKE. THIS IS WHY SOMETHING DIDN'T LOOK RIGHT WITH THE GAUGES. ON ENG START; THE WRONG GAUGE CAUSED THE SELECTOR SWITCH TO BURN OUT WHICH CAUSED CIRCUIT BREAKER L-22 (L VOLTMETER) AND CIRCUIT BREAKER L-24 (APU VOLTMETER) TO TRIP. THIS GAUGE HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY REPLACED 3 DAYS PRIOR TO THIS EVENT DUE TO AN INTEGRAL LIGHTING WRITE-UP. THE NEXT LEG IN THIS ACFT WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ABNORMALITIES.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.