37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 790384 |
Time | |
Date | 200806 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : gbd.airport |
State Reference | KS |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | PA-28 Cherokee/Archer II/Dakota/Pillan/Warrior |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | landing : roll |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Airliner 99 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 20000 flight time type : 19000 |
ASRS Report | 790384 |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : ground critical excursion : runway non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 75 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airport Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
We listened to AWOS. About 10 NM out; it was clear below 12000 ft and visibility was 10 mi; wind 280 degrees at 9 KTS. I told the student that the CTAF was 122.8 and he changed frequencys. I failed to notice he set the frequency to 120.8. He reported our position and intentions at 5 mi; 2 mi south and crossing midfield; downwind; left base; and final. After landing and during rollout; we noticed the commuter on about a 1/2 mi final. We had landed on runway 35 and the commuter was landing runway 17. I felt we might not have time to go to the next taxiway to clear the runway and a go around would put us in a perilous position; so we taxied off to the runway onto the smooth grass on the east side of the runway and were well clear of the runway when the commuter taxied by. This incident could have been avoided had I been more observant of the frequency on the radio. It was an oversight and hopefully will not happen again.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: STUDENT AND INSTRUCTOR PLTS HAVE CONFLICT WITH COMMUTER ACFT LNDG OPPOSITE DIRECTION AT NON-TOWERED ARPT. DISCOVER THEY HAD TRANSMITTED POSITION REPORTS ON WRONG CTAF FREQ.
Narrative: WE LISTENED TO AWOS. ABOUT 10 NM OUT; IT WAS CLR BELOW 12000 FT AND VISIBILITY WAS 10 MI; WIND 280 DEGS AT 9 KTS. I TOLD THE STUDENT THAT THE CTAF WAS 122.8 AND HE CHANGED FREQS. I FAILED TO NOTICE HE SET THE FREQ TO 120.8. HE RPTED OUR POS AND INTENTIONS AT 5 MI; 2 MI S AND XING MIDFIELD; DOWNWIND; L BASE; AND FINAL. AFTER LNDG AND DURING ROLLOUT; WE NOTICED THE COMMUTER ON ABOUT A 1/2 MI FINAL. WE HAD LANDED ON RWY 35 AND THE COMMUTER WAS LNDG RWY 17. I FELT WE MIGHT NOT HAVE TIME TO GO TO THE NEXT TXWY TO CLR THE RWY AND A GAR WOULD PUT US IN A PERILOUS POS; SO WE TAXIED OFF TO THE RWY ONTO THE SMOOTH GRASS ON THE E SIDE OF THE RWY AND WERE WELL CLR OF THE RWY WHEN THE COMMUTER TAXIED BY. THIS INCIDENT COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED HAD I BEEN MORE OBSERVANT OF THE FREQ ON THE RADIO. IT WAS AN OVERSIGHT AND HOPEFULLY WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.