Narrative:

Was notified by letter of possible discrepancies of engineering order X step 2.B(27)(B) and step 2.B(20) on B767-300 aircraft. As far as I know; the work was done per the pending airworthiness directive. I believe that after the job was completed and that while the floor boards were still up; there was work being done on the external power contractor that may have had an effect on steps accomplished.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: TWO MECHANICS REPORT ON BEING NOTIFIED ABOUT POSSIBLE DISCREPANCIES INVOLVING AN ENGINEERING ORDER TO SEAL AND PROPERLY LABEL A TRANSFORMER RECTIFIER UNIT GROUND BRACKET REWORK ON THEIR B767-300'S.

Narrative: WAS NOTIFIED BY LETTER OF POSSIBLE DISCREPANCIES OF ENGINEERING ORDER X STEP 2.B(27)(B) AND STEP 2.B(20) ON B767-300 ACFT. AS FAR AS I KNOW; THE WORK WAS DONE PER THE PENDING AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE. I BELIEVE THAT AFTER THE JOB WAS COMPLETED AND THAT WHILE THE FLOOR BOARDS WERE STILL UP; THERE WAS WORK BEING DONE ON THE EXTERNAL PWR CONTRACTOR THAT MAY HAVE HAD AN EFFECT ON STEPS ACCOMPLISHED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.