37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 804125 |
Time | |
Date | 200809 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 270 flight time total : 8100 flight time type : 5300 |
ASRS Report | 804125 |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure non adherence : company policies |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : unable |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Company |
Primary Problem | Company |
Narrative:
We arrived from inbound 42 mins late due to late inbound at ZZZ. Aircraft ACARS was deferred as inoperative. We were still attending to cockpit setup without a valid maintenance release when without any coordination; the customer service agent with a supervisor standing next to her closed the door and pulled jetbridge away. I open the window and yelled to them to stop; advising them that they can't do that. The customer service agent just shrugged and said; 'I forgot.' I then motioned to speak to the supervisor as to the inappropriateness of this non-standard conduct. The customer service supervisor just blew me off and they continued to pull the jetbridge back. We are unable to print a new maintenance release and with the jetbridge pulled back; maintenance is forced to drive a mechanical lift up to the skin of the aircraft and raise a platform/mechanic up to the cockpit window in order to give us a valid maintenance release. All this caused due to the non-standard actions of the customer service agent under the watchful eye of a supervisor who only cared about on-time...period! This resulted in an unnecessary risk of aircraft skin and ground equipment contact. This crew pushing behavior and total disregard for SOP's certainly increases the likelihood for a safety incident (not if; but when). Customer service is being pushed by management for on-time departures regardless of SOP's and possible consequence. On my previous trip my first officer and I were interrupted during our cockpit setup by the #1 flight attendant; stating that she was being directed to ask me to contact the customer service agent at the podium to deal with a boarding issue; as she could not step off the plane due to minimum staffing. My answer to this request was a simple no! I will not interrupt my cockpit flows to sort out boarding issues due to air carrier manpower (in-flight and customer service) reductions. Again; this is a major distraction to the cockpit at a very busy time; and will eventually lead to an incident.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN A320 DOOR WAS CLOSED BY CUSTOMER SVC BEFORE THE MAINT RELEASE WAS RCVD FORCING MAINT TO USE A LIFT TO DELIVER THE REQUIRED DOCUMENT.
Narrative: WE ARRIVED FROM INBOUND 42 MINS LATE DUE TO LATE INBOUND AT ZZZ. ACFT ACARS WAS DEFERRED AS INOP. WE WERE STILL ATTENDING TO COCKPIT SETUP WITHOUT A VALID MAINT RELEASE WHEN WITHOUT ANY COORD; THE CUSTOMER SVC AGENT WITH A SUPVR STANDING NEXT TO HER CLOSED THE DOOR AND PULLED JETBRIDGE AWAY. I OPEN THE WINDOW AND YELLED TO THEM TO STOP; ADVISING THEM THAT THEY CAN'T DO THAT. THE CUSTOMER SVC AGENT JUST SHRUGGED AND SAID; 'I FORGOT.' I THEN MOTIONED TO SPEAK TO THE SUPVR AS TO THE INAPPROPRIATENESS OF THIS NON-STANDARD CONDUCT. THE CUSTOMER SVC SUPVR JUST BLEW ME OFF AND THEY CONTINUED TO PULL THE JETBRIDGE BACK. WE ARE UNABLE TO PRINT A NEW MAINT RELEASE AND WITH THE JETBRIDGE PULLED BACK; MAINT IS FORCED TO DRIVE A MECHANICAL LIFT UP TO THE SKIN OF THE ACFT AND RAISE A PLATFORM/MECH UP TO THE COCKPIT WINDOW IN ORDER TO GIVE US A VALID MAINT RELEASE. ALL THIS CAUSED DUE TO THE NON-STANDARD ACTIONS OF THE CUSTOMER SVC AGENT UNDER THE WATCHFUL EYE OF A SUPVR WHO ONLY CARED ABOUT ON-TIME...PERIOD! THIS RESULTED IN AN UNNECESSARY RISK OF ACFT SKIN AND GND EQUIP CONTACT. THIS CREW PUSHING BEHAVIOR AND TOTAL DISREGARD FOR SOP'S CERTAINLY INCREASES THE LIKELIHOOD FOR A SAFETY INCIDENT (NOT IF; BUT WHEN). CUSTOMER SVC IS BEING PUSHED BY MGMNT FOR ON-TIME DEPS REGARDLESS OF SOP'S AND POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCE. ON MY PREVIOUS TRIP MY FO AND I WERE INTERRUPTED DURING OUR COCKPIT SETUP BY THE #1 FLT ATTENDANT; STATING THAT SHE WAS BEING DIRECTED TO ASK ME TO CONTACT THE CUSTOMER SVC AGENT AT THE PODIUM TO DEAL WITH A BOARDING ISSUE; AS SHE COULD NOT STEP OFF THE PLANE DUE TO MINIMUM STAFFING. MY ANSWER TO THIS REQUEST WAS A SIMPLE NO! I WILL NOT INTERRUPT MY COCKPIT FLOWS TO SORT OUT BOARDING ISSUES DUE TO ACR MANPOWER (INFLT AND CUSTOMER SVC) REDUCTIONS. AGAIN; THIS IS A MAJOR DISTR TO THE COCKPIT AT A VERY BUSY TIME; AND WILL EVENTUALLY LEAD TO AN INCIDENT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.