37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 822021 |
Time | |
Date | 200901 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SDL.Airport |
State Reference | AZ |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Challenger CL604 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Route In Use | SID SCOT5 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | FMS/FMC |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 60 Flight Crew Total 12450 Flight Crew Type 2450 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
This event occurred on departure from sdl on the SCOT5 SID. We had loaded the SCOT5 into the FMS as we normally do. We have flown this SID before using the same FMS and had never experienced any problems. This time; however; the FMS did not follow the procedure which consists of a 300 degree heading after departure to intercept the pxr 336 degree radial to the banyo intersection. We immediately turned right to a heading to intercept the radial but went through it. The controller did not say anything about it. He then gave us a heading to fly to the northeast which was part of our flight plan. The gist of all of this is that we were not prepared for the automation to do something unexpected. Day after day the automation does exactly what you expect it to do; so when it does not; it tends to take you by surprise (complacency!).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CL604 failed to capture the 336 radial out of PXR on the SCOT5 SID from SDL.
Narrative: This event occurred on departure from SDL on the SCOT5 SID. We had loaded the SCOT5 into the FMS as we normally do. We have flown this SID before using the same FMS and had never experienced any problems. This time; however; the FMS did not follow the procedure which consists of a 300 degree heading after departure to intercept the PXR 336 degree radial to the BANYO Intersection. We immediately turned right to a heading to intercept the radial but went through it. The Controller did not say anything about it. He then gave us a heading to fly to the northeast which was part of our flight plan. The gist of all of this is that we were not prepared for the automation to do something unexpected. Day after day the automation does exactly what you expect it to do; so when it does not; it tends to take you by surprise (complacency!).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.