37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 836835 |
Time | |
Date | 200905 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | CEC.Airport |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna 180 Skywagon |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Flight Engineer |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 44 Flight Crew Total 19462 Flight Crew Type 1500 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Clearance |
Narrative:
Approaching crescent city from the southeast I received approach clearance for the ILS/DME runway 11 approach from seattle center; cross cec VOR at or above 4000 ft. Instead of turning outbound on the localizer and executing the procedure turn; I intercepted the 11 DME arc. I have practiced this approach many times on an instrument simulator and had always flown an arc to intercept the inbound localizer. Seattle called me several minutes after crossing cec VOR and asked if I was inbound yet and I reported I was on the left hand arc. He made no other comments and asked me to report cancelling IFR. I now realize the only proper approach transition from over the VOR was the procedure turn. Because I have practiced this approach so much using the arcs; I missed the arrow showing the 297R transition outbound from cec VOR. In the future I will study my approach charts more carefully and not assume the way I've done the approach before is the right way in a particular situation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: IFR-rated general aviation pilot received ILS/DME Runway 11 approach clearance to CEC; elected to use Runway 11 DME ARC; was then questioned by ZSE regarding position and concluded flying the arc was inappropriate given the clearance received.
Narrative: Approaching Crescent City from the southeast I received approach clearance for the ILS/DME Runway 11 approach from Seattle Center; cross CEC VOR at or above 4000 FT. Instead of turning outbound on the localizer and executing the procedure turn; I intercepted the 11 DME ARC. I have practiced this approach many times on an instrument simulator and had always flown an arc to intercept the inbound localizer. Seattle called me several minutes after crossing CEC VOR and asked if I was inbound yet and I reported I was on the left hand arc. He made no other comments and asked me to report cancelling IFR. I now realize the only proper approach transition from over the VOR was the procedure turn. Because I have practiced this approach so much using the arcs; I missed the arrow showing the 297R transition outbound from CEC VOR. In the future I will study my approach charts more carefully and not assume the way I've done the approach before is the right way in a particular situation.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.