Narrative:

Following receiving clearance for a visual approach to runway 28L; we switched to sfo tower frequency. The pilot flying was high and fast on approach; and I; as relief pilot; was monitoring his airspeed and flap configuration. The pilot flying called for flaps 25 and they were selected; but the pilot flying allowed the airspeed to increase; causing flap relief to 20 degrees. The pilot flying then decreased airspeed; and called for flaps 30. After 30 flaps were selected; the pilot flying again increased airspeed causing flaps to load relief and remain at 25 degrees. I was concentrating on the pilot flying's airspeed maintenance and watching for when the flaps would move to 30 degrees. The PF reduced airspeed; and the flaps moved to 30 degrees at about 600 ft AGL. We landed uneventfully and exited the runway. At that time; the pilot not flying asked the crew if we remembered receiving a clearance to land. Because of the intensity of concentration on the pilot flying's approach; none of us remembered for certain if a landing clearance had been received from the tower. We asked the tower later if we had clearance to land; and they said we had received a green light. This incident occurred because the pilot flying was behind the airplane; high and fast on approach; and very close to violating the stabilized approach criteria. We were all fixated on monitoring the pilot-flying's performance; and thus no one thought to query the tower for landing clearance. Nothing unsafe occurred; but this was an omission that could have had much more serious consequences.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B747 flight crew was concerned about landing without a clearance at SFO. All of their attention was focused on an unstabilized approach after a fatiguing international flight.

Narrative: Following receiving clearance for a visual approach to Runway 28L; we switched to SFO Tower frequency. The pilot flying was high and fast on approach; and I; as relief pilot; was monitoring his airspeed and flap configuration. The pilot flying called for Flaps 25 and they were selected; but the pilot flying allowed the airspeed to increase; causing flap relief to 20 degrees. The pilot flying then decreased airspeed; and called for Flaps 30. After 30 flaps were selected; the pilot flying again increased airspeed causing flaps to load relief and remain at 25 degrees. I was concentrating on the pilot flying's airspeed maintenance and watching for when the flaps would move to 30 degrees. The PF reduced airspeed; and the flaps moved to 30 degrees at about 600 FT AGL. We landed uneventfully and exited the runway. At that time; the pilot not flying asked the crew if we remembered receiving a clearance to land. Because of the intensity of concentration on the pilot flying's approach; none of us remembered for certain if a landing clearance had been received from the tower. We asked the tower later if we had clearance to land; and they said we had received a green light. This incident occurred because the pilot flying was behind the airplane; high and fast on approach; and very close to violating the stabilized approach criteria. We were all fixated on monitoring the pilot-flying's performance; and thus no one thought to query the tower for landing clearance. Nothing unsafe occurred; but this was an omission that could have had much more serious consequences.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.