37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 843174 |
Time | |
Date | 200907 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 202 Flight Crew Type 4000 |
Person 2 | |
Function | First Officer |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 241 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Event / Encounter Other / Unknown |
Narrative:
Contacted ground crew with; 'a's off; brakes set.' tug driver responded with; 'doors closed; walkaround complete; safety zone is clear.' I released the brakes; cleared him to push; and we left the gate. Normal engine start; after start flows; before taxi checklist. We were cleared to runway xxr and left the ramp for the long taxi down the parallel. Headed northbound and crossing runway xy; tower called to tell us that operations called and thought we might have an open cargo door and cleared us back to the ramp. We entered the ramp; shut down the #2 engine; and a ramper closed the door. Subsequent engine start; checklist; taxi; takeoff; and flight to our destination were uneventful. Upon arriving; the time sheet was handed in to us with the explanation for the late departure that the crew pushed the gate without doing a walkaround and had to return to secure a door. All procedures were followed and while I don't think I missed the door annunciator light. I think that we have great procedures at the company. I also think that everyone involved in this was trying to do the right thing. Where the door came open; I don't know; but I do think we would have caught it with the before takeoff checklist. A concern I have is with the fairly new procedures whereby the gate agents must account for every minute an aircraft falls behind schedule on their watch; it has really started a 'blame game'.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-300 must return to gate to have cargo door properly secured.
Narrative: Contacted Ground Crew with; 'A's off; brakes set.' Tug Driver responded with; 'Doors closed; walkaround complete; safety zone is clear.' I released the brakes; cleared him to push; and we left the gate. Normal engine start; after start flows; Before Taxi checklist. We were cleared to Runway XXR and left the ramp for the long taxi down the parallel. Headed northbound and crossing Runway XY; Tower called to tell us that Operations called and thought we might have an open cargo door and cleared us back to the ramp. We entered the ramp; shut down the #2 engine; and a Ramper closed the door. Subsequent engine start; checklist; taxi; takeoff; and flight to our destination were uneventful. Upon arriving; the time sheet was handed in to us with the explanation for the late departure that the crew pushed the gate without doing a walkaround and had to return to secure a door. All procedures were followed and while I don't think I missed the door annunciator light. I think that we have great procedures at the company. I also think that everyone involved in this was trying to do the right thing. Where the door came open; I don't know; but I do think we would have caught it with the Before Takeoff Checklist. A concern I have is with the fairly new procedures whereby the gate agents must account for every minute an aircraft falls behind schedule on their watch; it has really started a 'blame game'.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.