Narrative:

Approaching rhv, approximately 10 mile north. I called the tower; was given a squawk code and a report of small aircraft X traffic also inbound. As I descended thru 1700' I was told there was an small aircraft X at 12 O'clock altitude unknown. I reported, 'no contact'. The tower then asked the small aircraft X for altitude, to which the small aircraft X responded '1600''. I stopped my descent, climbed back to 1800, and turned left 20 degree. Approximately a minute later the tower reported the small aircraft X was on my right. I responded, 'no contact'. Shortly the small aircraft X reported that I had passed within 300'. At no time did I see the small aircraft X. No suggestions to prevent a recurrence other then to observe that see-and-avoid is inadequate. Radar and an altitude reporting transponder are essential.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CLOSE PROX TWO GA SMA ACFT CONVERGING ON RHV FOR LNDG.

Narrative: APCHING RHV, APPROX 10 MILE NORTH. I CALLED THE TWR; WAS GIVEN A SQUAWK CODE AND A REPORT OF SMA X TFC ALSO INBOUND. AS I DESCENDED THRU 1700' I WAS TOLD THERE WAS AN SMA X AT 12 O'CLOCK ALT UNKNOWN. I REPORTED, 'NO CONTACT'. THE TWR THEN ASKED THE SMA X FOR ALT, TO WHICH THE SMA X RESPONDED '1600''. I STOPPED MY DESCENT, CLIMBED BACK TO 1800, AND TURNED LEFT 20 DEG. APPROX A MINUTE LATER THE TWR REPORTED THE SMA X WAS ON MY RIGHT. I RESPONDED, 'NO CONTACT'. SHORTLY THE SMA X REPORTED THAT I HAD PASSED WITHIN 300'. AT NO TIME DID I SEE THE SMA X. NO SUGGESTIONS TO PREVENT A RECURRENCE OTHER THEN TO OBSERVE THAT SEE-AND-AVOID IS INADEQUATE. RADAR AND AN ALT REPORTING TRANSPONDER ARE ESSENTIAL.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.