 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
DA900 captain reports exceeding 1500 ft prior to the teb 4.5 DME during the TEB6 departure from runway 24.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 854367 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200909 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | TEB.Airport |
| State Reference | NJ |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Falcon 900 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
| Route In Use | SID TEB |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Multiengine |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 45 Flight Crew Total 17000 Flight Crew Type 700 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Altitude Overshoot Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Clearance |
Narrative:
Both pilot in command and second in command review teb 6 departure and briefed accordingly. Second in command was pilot flying. Airplane; cleared for takeoff. SID called for 240 degree heading until reaching 1500 ft; then right turn to 280 degrees; then at 4.3 DME climb to 2000 ft. A very simple SID. When the second in command leveled at 1500 ft. We received a radio call and there was some confusion about SID; so pilot in command looked down at SID to review for clarification; then when I looked up we were at 1700 ft climbing. Departure control told us to comply with SID. We started down to 1500 and then departure control gave us a new climb and heading clearance. To my knowledge there were no traffic conflicts. Solution: pilot in command (me) should have been confident in actual SID; but second in command should have been holding altitude instead of climbing. This is a simple SID; yet an experienced crew made an error. It proves that this can happen to you!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: DA900 Captain reports exceeding 1500 FT prior to the TEB 4.5 DME during the TEB6 departure from Runway 24.
Narrative: Both pilot in command and second in command review TEB 6 departure and briefed accordingly. Second in command was pilot flying. Airplane; cleared for takeoff. SID called for 240 degree heading until reaching 1500 FT; then right turn to 280 degrees; then at 4.3 DME climb to 2000 FT. A very simple SID. When the second in command leveled at 1500 FT. We received a radio call and there was some confusion about SID; so pilot in command looked down at SID to review for clarification; then when I looked up we were at 1700 FT climbing. Departure control told us to comply with SID. We started down to 1500 and then departure control gave us a new climb and heading clearance. To my knowledge there were no traffic conflicts. Solution: Pilot in command (me) should have been confident in actual SID; but second in command should have been holding altitude instead of climbing. This is a simple SID; yet an experienced crew made an error. It proves that this can happen to you!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.