37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 854898 |
Time | |
Date | 200910 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | PA-24 Comanche |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Route In Use | Other Local |
Flight Plan | None |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Fuel Distribution System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Sea Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Commercial |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 26 Flight Crew Total 860 Flight Crew Type 47 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Ground Event / Encounter Ground Strike - Aircraft Inflight Event / Encounter Fuel Issue |
Narrative:
I had already given 4 different airplane rides and on the 5th one; the engine quit on take off when I was about 300 ft AGL. I switched fuel tanks (4 tanks on board) and verified the fuel pump was on and descended to the 3000ft runway. By now I had already used up more than half of the available runway. I landed on the grass at the end of the runway and coasted through a chain link fence; approx 150 yards from the runway threshold. The aircraft received substantial damage and no one was injured. There was no fire nor any fuel leakage. Most of the damage was to the right wing. The prop did not suddenly stop due to this event. To prevent this from recurring; switching to the fullest tank prior to takeoff; would have worked. To prevent damage to the aircraft; moving the fence to a location not so close to the runway. In this case there was 3000ft of overrun available on the other side of the fence. I do admit thinking that I should switch fuel tanks prior to take-off but the fuel gage indicated 1/2 full. So I elected not to switch tanks. As I mentioned earlier; when airborne; after the engine quit; I did switch to the other main tank and the engine did not start immediately which needed to happen if I was to clear the fence.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A PA-24 (Commanche) pilot reported engine failure because of fuel starvation shortly after takeoff. He landed on the remaining runway and ran through a fence near the end of the runway.
Narrative: I had already given 4 different airplane rides and on the 5th one; the engine quit on take off when I was about 300 ft AGL. I switched fuel tanks (4 tanks on board) and verified the fuel pump was on and descended to the 3000ft runway. By now I had already used up more than half of the available runway. I landed on the grass at the end of the runway and coasted through a chain link fence; approx 150 yards from the runway threshold. The aircraft received substantial damage and no one was injured. There was no fire nor any fuel leakage. Most of the damage was to the right wing. The prop did not suddenly stop due to this event. To prevent this from recurring; switching to the fullest tank prior to takeoff; would have worked. To prevent damage to the aircraft; moving the fence to a location not so close to the runway. In this case there was 3000ft of overrun available on the other side of the fence. I do admit thinking that I should switch fuel tanks prior to take-off but the fuel gage indicated 1/2 full. So I elected not to switch tanks. As I mentioned earlier; when airborne; after the engine quit; I did switch to the other main tank and the engine did not start immediately which needed to happen if I was to clear the fence.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.