37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 859849 |
Time | |
Date | 200911 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | FAI.Tower |
State Reference | AK |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna 150 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | PA-31 Navajo/Chieftan/Mojave/T1040 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Departure Approach |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Aircraft X departed fai TRSA northbound (020). His initial altitude report was 600' higher than the mode C indicated; even after verifying the altimeter setting; so I told him to stop altitude squawk. He reached about ten miles north of fai and requested to return due to deteriorating weather. Meanwhile; aircraft Y departed fai.V438.fyu; on a 032 initial heading; I issued a left turn to 330 leaving 2200 to join V438. I told aircraft X to enter the left downwind for runway 2R. He made a 180 and turned south towards aircraft Y. I was distracted by aircraft Y; also a TRSA departure; who was encountering IMC and requesting an IFR pickup to cik. HO1/controller in charge pointed out the conflict between the two. I turned aircraft X right 20 degrees and issued traffic. Aircraft Y reported aircraft X in sight and was told to maintain visual; I believe before the targets merged; but I'm not sure. Aircraft X had reported at 2800; last altitude readout I remember seeing on aircraft Y was 2400. Bottom line; I should have immediately realized that aircraft X's return to fai would be a direct conflict with aircraft Y. Aircraft Y's IFR pickup could have waited a few minutes until I'd resolved the conflict; and I should have been doubly careful since aircraft X's mode C was disabled (no ca). Recommendation; I was reluctant to use altitude separation since aircraft Y was climbing into a higher MVA and aircraft X was returning for weather; but I could have issued a sharper turn for aircraft X and turned aircraft Y out to the east as well.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FAI controller described near loss of separation event when failing to issue timely corrective action/s.
Narrative: Aircraft X departed FAI TRSA northbound (020). His initial altitude report was 600' higher than the Mode C indicated; even after verifying the altimeter setting; so I told him to stop altitude squawk. He reached about ten miles north of FAI and requested to return due to deteriorating weather. Meanwhile; Aircraft Y departed FAI.V438.FYU; on a 032 initial heading; I issued a left turn to 330 leaving 2200 to join V438. I told Aircraft X to enter the left downwind for runway 2R. He made a 180 and turned south towards Aircraft Y. I was distracted by Aircraft Y; also a TRSA departure; who was encountering IMC and requesting an IFR pickup to CIK. HO1/CIC pointed out the conflict between the two. I turned Aircraft X right 20 degrees and issued traffic. Aircraft Y reported Aircraft X in sight and was told to maintain visual; I believe before the targets merged; but I'm not sure. Aircraft X had reported at 2800; last altitude readout I remember seeing on Aircraft Y was 2400. Bottom line; I should have immediately realized that Aircraft X's return to FAI would be a direct conflict with Aircraft Y. Aircraft Y's IFR pickup could have waited a few minutes until I'd resolved the conflict; and I should have been doubly careful since Aircraft X's Mode C was disabled (no CA). Recommendation; I was reluctant to use altitude separation since Aircraft Y was climbing into a higher MVA and Aircraft X was returning for weather; but I could have issued a sharper turn for Aircraft X and turned Aircraft Y out to the east as well.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.