37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 861511 |
Time | |
Date | 200910 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B767-300 and 300 ER |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Autoland |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
After reviewing the flight plan; I noted that a flight control computer check was required. Although I have been very reluctant in the past to perform autoland checks with passengers on board due to the many variables which no one at this company seems concerned with. Maintaining a sterile environment around runway or wind conditions which may be within limits but since most autoland approaches are to low visibility low wind conditions doing these during normal operations is dangerous and unsafe. Coming to the point; as we landed; after flying all night; the plane touched down in the middle of the runway then immediately deviated left of course; nearly ending a perfectly safe flight in disaster. Although I appreciate the companies continued effort to gloss over the inherent danger of testing our aircraft with passengers aboard; someone is going to end up in the grass or worse with lots of pointing fingers which will no doubt include the captain who was just doing another autoland check to save the company money.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B767-300 Captain reported conducting an autoland test which resulted in a centerline tracking deviation after touchdown.
Narrative: After reviewing the flight plan; I noted that a Flight Control Computer check was required. Although I have been very reluctant in the past to perform autoland checks with passengers on board due to the many variables which no one at this Company seems concerned with. Maintaining a sterile environment around runway or wind conditions which may be within limits but since most autoland approaches are to low visibility low wind conditions doing these during normal operations is dangerous and unsafe. Coming to the point; as we landed; after flying all night; the plane touched down in the middle of the runway then immediately deviated left of course; nearly ending a perfectly safe flight in disaster. Although I appreciate the companies continued effort to gloss over the inherent danger of testing our aircraft with passengers aboard; someone is going to end up in the grass or worse with lots of pointing fingers which will no doubt include the Captain who was just doing another autoland check to save the company money.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.