37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 862132 |
Time | |
Date | 200911 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | DFW.Tower |
State Reference | TX |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Citation Excel (C560XL) |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Handoff / Assist Instructor |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
I was conducting OJT on the local assist east 1 when the dallas north TRACON called to initiate a point-out on aircraft X; inbound and landing ads. The dn controller stated '8 miles north; aircraft X; left downwind at 3000 for addison; if you'll say 'point-out approved' '--which my trainee did after quickly scanning the racd for the aforementioned aircraft--although the developmental did not actually see the radar target or data block of aircraft X. The dn controller then hung up the land line. Within 2 minutes; aircraft X was visible on the racd as described by the dn controller; and coordination was ensured with le-3. Recommendation; as soon as the developmental stated 'point-out approved' to the dn controller; I should have immediately said 'disregard; unable point-out; we do not see the aircraft'. But reasonably expecting the flight path of the aircraft; I instead opted to observe the developmental begin to panic as he realized that he had approved a non-observed aircraft to enter the airspace without any idea where the aircraft actually was. This action; on my part; was totally unacceptable and I realized this almost immediately. While the learning lesson was valuable; my choice of implementing it was terribly poor and risky in itself. In the future; I will utilize 'chalk-talks' during OJT debriefs to depict the consequences rather than allow a potentially unsafe situation to develop into something further; even if I'm confident that it will be safely completed and resolved.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: DFW controller providing OJT failed to correct the developmental controller during an inappropriate point out procedure from another sector resulting in a technical airspace incursion.
Narrative: I was conducting OJT on the Local Assist East 1 when the Dallas North TRACON called to initiate a point-out on Aircraft X; inbound and landing ADS. The DN controller stated '8 miles north; Aircraft X; left downwind at 3000 for Addison; if you'll say 'point-out approved' '--which my trainee did after quickly scanning the RACD for the aforementioned aircraft--although the developmental did NOT actually see the radar target or data block of Aircraft X. The DN controller then hung up the land line. Within 2 minutes; Aircraft X was visible on the RACD as described by the DN controller; and coordination was ensured with LE-3. Recommendation; as soon as the developmental stated 'point-out approved' to the DN controller; I should have immediately said 'DISREGARD; UNABLE POINT-OUT; WE DO NOT SEE THE AIRCRAFT'. But reasonably expecting the flight path of the aircraft; I instead opted to observe the developmental begin to panic as he realized that he had approved a NON-observed aircraft to enter the airspace without any idea where the aircraft actually was. This action; on my part; was totally unacceptable and I realized this almost immediately. While the learning lesson was valuable; my choice of implementing it was terribly POOR and risky in itself. In the future; I will utilize 'chalk-talks' during OJT debriefs to depict the consequences rather than allow a potentially unsafe situation to develop into something further; even if I'm confident that it will be safely completed and resolved.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.