37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 86411 |
Time | |
Date | 198805 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : sac |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 17300 msl bound upper : 18000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zoa |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Military Trainer |
Flight Phase | cruise other descent other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Military Trainer |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude cruise other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : radar |
Qualification | controller : developmental |
Experience | controller radar : 3 |
ASRS Report | 86411 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : radar |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller radar : 18 |
ASRS Report | 86487 |
Events | |
Anomaly | airspace violation : exit non adherence : clearance non adherence : required legal separation other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : unspecified other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance other |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 24000 vertical : 700 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Hummer 1 MOA in use by an MTR X. MTR X requested clearance back to mhr and was cleared to a fix to expect the hi ILS. Pilot indicated he did not wish to proceed to that fix, and instead wanted to go to a fix ten miles away. The pilot was told to stand by. Since he refused the previous clearance, I thought it was implicit that he would stay in the MOA. Instead, he exited and separation was lost with an MTR Y aircraft. I feel the problem was caused by both miscom and by slow turns by both aircraft involved. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: callback verified the length of service on instrument reporter. MTR X left the hummer MOA without a clearance and was considered a spillout. Incident was classified as pilot deviation on MTR X. Reporter had let incident progress as far as possible to facilitate the OJT of deviation reporter, but when coordination was late and trnee did not reach fast enough, instrument reporter stepped in. Would not have been a separation problem had the MTR X stayed in the MOA.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MTR SPILLED OUT OF MOA AFTER RECOVERY CLRNC WAS REFUSED AND CREATED A LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION SITUATION WITH ANOTHER MTR ENROUTE TO THE MOA.
Narrative: HUMMER 1 MOA IN USE BY AN MTR X. MTR X REQUESTED CLRNC BACK TO MHR AND WAS CLRED TO A FIX TO EXPECT THE HI ILS. PLT INDICATED HE DID NOT WISH TO PROCEED TO THAT FIX, AND INSTEAD WANTED TO GO TO A FIX TEN MILES AWAY. THE PLT WAS TOLD TO STAND BY. SINCE HE REFUSED THE PREVIOUS CLRNC, I THOUGHT IT WAS IMPLICIT THAT HE WOULD STAY IN THE MOA. INSTEAD, HE EXITED AND SEPARATION WAS LOST WITH AN MTR Y ACFT. I FEEL THE PROBLEM WAS CAUSED BY BOTH MISCOM AND BY SLOW TURNS BY BOTH ACFT INVOLVED. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH REPORTER REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: CALLBACK VERIFIED THE LENGTH OF SERVICE ON INSTR RPTR. MTR X LEFT THE HUMMER MOA WITHOUT A CLRNC AND WAS CONSIDERED A SPILLOUT. INCIDENT WAS CLASSIFIED AS PLT DEVIATION ON MTR X. RPTR HAD LET INCIDENT PROGRESS AS FAR AS POSSIBLE TO FACILITATE THE OJT OF DEV RPTR, BUT WHEN COORD WAS LATE AND TRNEE DID NOT REACH FAST ENOUGH, INSTR RPTR STEPPED IN. WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A SEPARATION PROBLEM HAD THE MTR X STAYED IN THE MOA.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.