37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 865759 |
Time | |
Date | 200912 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZNY.ARTCC |
State Reference | NY |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | DC-9 50 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Enroute |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Radar 21 Flight Crew Total 200 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 18000 Vertical 300 |
Narrative:
End of shift; supervisor was combing sector into midnight configuration. I assumed 2 of the 4 high sectors; with base altitude of FL330. He\she then came over and told me that 'I have it all;' which I interpreted to mean I had assumed the intermediate highs as well; (FL240-FL320). However this was not the case. I further believe I had assumed that airspace when looking at the controller who as working that sector was turned away from scope talking to a trainee. I was working a DC9 at FL330 that needed to descend to FL290 per letter of agreement. I initiated the clearance thinking; I owned the airspace. Conflict alert was immediate with traffic at FL320. I then realized intermediate sector was still open. I heard that controller turn aircraft left. I turned 65 degrees right. Loss of separation occurred; closest proximity was 3 mile 300 ft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ZOB controller described a loss of separation event when sector combination coordination was unclear and an aircraft was issued a descent into airspace that in fact had not yet been released/combined.
Narrative: End of shift; Supervisor was combing sector into midnight configuration. I assumed 2 of the 4 high sectors; with base altitude of FL330. He\she then came over and told me that 'I have it all;' which I interpreted to mean I had assumed the intermediate highs as well; (FL240-FL320). However this was not the case. I further believe I had assumed that airspace when looking at the Controller who as working that sector was turned away from scope talking to a Trainee. I was working a DC9 at FL330 that needed to descend to FL290 per letter of agreement. I initiated the clearance thinking; I owned the airspace. Conflict alert was immediate with traffic at FL320. I then realized intermediate sector was still open. I heard that Controller turn aircraft left. I turned 65 degrees right. Loss of separation occurred; closest proximity was 3 mile 300 FT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.