37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 885695 |
Time | |
Date | 201004 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ONT.Airport |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Widebody Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Route In Use | SID POM7 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Flight Engineer |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 100 Flight Crew Total 7000 Flight Crew Type 1500 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
Departing ont we were assigned the pom 7 departure. Failed to intercept the initial radial; immediately called socal departure and asked for a vector to intercept course. We were given a heading to intercept the outbound radial and continued with the remainder of the pom 7. [We] complied with all crossing restrictions. We were concerned with our initial altitude restriction of 7000 ft because the aircraft was climbing at a rate of approximately 6000 fpm. This diverted our attention away from course intercept. An earlier reduction in climb rate would have allowed us to divide our attention between level off and course intercept.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A widebody Flight Crew failed to intercept the initial leg of the POM 7 SID from ONT. Believed a rapid rate of climb after takeoff to have been a contributing distraction.
Narrative: Departing ONT we were assigned the POM 7 Departure. Failed to intercept the initial radial; immediately called SOCAL Departure and asked for a vector to intercept course. We were given a heading to intercept the outbound radial and continued with the remainder of the POM 7. [We] complied with all crossing restrictions. We were concerned with our initial altitude restriction of 7000 ft because the aircraft was climbing at a rate of approximately 6000 fpm. This diverted our attention away from course intercept. An earlier reduction in climb rate would have allowed us to divide our attention between level off and course intercept.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.