Narrative:

Aircraft X was told to turn to 230 intercept the cno localizer and maintain 4;200. He read back descending to 4;300 turning to 230 to intercept the localizer. I corrected him by saying negative maintain four thousand..forty two hundred. He read back four thousand..forty-two. I saw him descend to 4;000 MSL and said 'verify four thousand two hundred.' he said negative I thought you said four thousand forty two. The MVA was 4;200. My phraseology was misleading. I should have said maintain four thousand two hundred...forty two hundred; but I didn't complete the first part which caused confusion. It never occurred to me that a pilot would fly 4;042 ft and think that it was an assigned IFR altitude. That's why I didn't correct him when he said descending to forty two.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SCT Controller described MVA event when an aircraft descended below the issued altitude of 4;200 to 4;042; the reporter acknowledging phraseology utilized was misleading.

Narrative: Aircraft X was told to turn to 230 intercept the CNO localizer and maintain 4;200. He read back descending to 4;300 turning to 230 to intercept the localizer. I corrected him by saying negative maintain four thousand..forty two hundred. He read back four thousand..forty-two. I saw him descend to 4;000 MSL and said 'verify four thousand two hundred.' he said negative I thought you said four thousand forty two. The MVA was 4;200. My phraseology was misleading. I should have said maintain four thousand two hundred...forty two hundred; but I didn't complete the first part which caused confusion. It never occurred to me that a pilot would fly 4;042 FT and think that it was an assigned IFR altitude. That's why I didn't correct him when he said descending to forty two.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.