 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
B767 flight crew experienced a track deviation departing lfpg runway 26R on the lgl-1B RNAV departure after selecting the the pgs 269 radial to fly instead of the 266 radial. Reporters cite three runway changes and fatigue as factors in the deviation.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 897014 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201007 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | LFPG.Airport |
| State Reference | FO |
| Environment | |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | B767-300 and 300 ER |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Takeoff |
| Route In Use | SID LGL-1B |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
Takeoff out of lfpg assigned departure with a radial 266 off pgs. Had proper radial dialed initially. When lining up for takeoff first officer said SID required radial 269. Looked down at plate and saw 269 number and agreed to change radial to 269. On departure ATC gave vector to left to get back on course. We were .3NM off to right of course. I should have looked closer at plate but we were taking runway and I saw the 269 heading to capture radial 266 and made the change by mistake. Fatigue on european trip surely a factor. Had flown the departure many times and should have challenged the change.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B767 flight crew experienced a track deviation departing LFPG Runway 26R on the LGL-1B RNAV departure after selecting the the PGS 269 radial to fly instead of the 266 radial. Reporters cite three runway changes and fatigue as factors in the deviation.
Narrative: Takeoff out of LFPG assigned departure with a radial 266 off PGS. Had proper radial dialed initially. When lining up for takeoff First Officer said SID required radial 269. Looked down at plate and saw 269 number and agreed to change radial to 269. On departure ATC gave vector to left to get back on course. We were .3NM off to right of course. I should have looked closer at plate but we were taking runway and I saw the 269 heading to capture radial 266 and made the change by mistake. Fatigue on European trip surely a factor. Had flown the departure many times and should have challenged the change.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.