37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 912899 |
Time | |
Date | 201010 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | MD-83 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Toilet Smoke Overheat Fire Detectors & Warning |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 105 Flight Crew Total 7900 Flight Crew Type 2700 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe |
Narrative:
Shortly after gear was retracted during a normal takeoff the flight attendants chimed us stating the lavatory fire detection system in the aft lavatory was alarming. Seconds later a second alarm began to ring; but this time in the forward lavatory. The flight attendants quickly verified there was no smoke or fire in any lavatory or in the cabin. We had leveled off at 5;000 ft per our clearance. We had no indications of anything malfunctioning or fire in the cockpit. I again verified with the flight attendants that there were no signs of smoke or fire. We then consulted with the QRH and there was no guidance found concerning lavatory smoke; fire; or false alarms. We decided to declare an emergency as a precaution and return to the airfield. We proceeded to the airport and decided to hold since there was no physical evidence of smoke or fire and agreed it was a false warning. We held for a about 10 to 15 minutes over the airport to reduce to below max gross landing weight to ensure no structural damage would be caused due to a false warning. We were holding directly over the airfield if any additional fire or smoke indications should arise; providing an alternate plan if needed. After landing maintenance personnel determined it was false lavatory smoke alarms. Hopefully guidance could be included within the QRH concerning lavatory smoke; fire; or false alarms.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MD80 flight crew was informed by the Flight Attendants that two lavatory smoke alarms are going off with no detectable smoke. The crew elected to return to their departure airport after holding to land below maximum landing weight.
Narrative: Shortly after gear was retracted during a normal takeoff the Flight Attendants chimed us stating the lavatory fire detection system in the aft lavatory was alarming. Seconds later a second alarm began to ring; but this time in the forward lavatory. The Flight Attendants quickly verified there was NO smoke or fire in any lavatory or in the cabin. We had leveled off at 5;000 FT per our clearance. We had no indications of anything malfunctioning or fire in the cockpit. I again verified with the Flight Attendants that there were no signs of smoke or fire. We then consulted with the QRH and there was NO guidance found concerning lavatory smoke; fire; or false alarms. We decided to declare an emergency as a precaution and return to the airfield. We proceeded to the airport and decided to hold since there was NO physical evidence of smoke or fire and agreed it was a false warning. We held for a about 10 to 15 minutes over the airport to reduce to below Max Gross Landing Weight to ensure no structural damage would be caused due to a false warning. We were holding directly over the airfield if any additional fire or smoke indications should arise; providing an alternate plan if needed. After landing Maintenance personnel determined it was false lavatory smoke alarms. Hopefully guidance could be included within the QRH concerning Lavatory smoke; fire; or false alarms.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.