37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 92595 |
Time | |
Date | 198808 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : lfi |
State Reference | VA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1500 msl bound upper : 1500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | military facility : lfi tracon : orf tower : lfi artcc : zdc |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Military Transport |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Fighter |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller radar : 9 |
ASRS Report | 92595 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : required legal separation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : insufficient time other |
Consequence | faa : investigated Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 12000 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
When I relieved another controller the loss of sep had already occurred. An mlt was on 5 mi final, visual approach, on lfi tower frequency. An fgt was on 7 mi final, PAR approach, on lfi rfc frequency. The problem was discovered when the flight had to go around and lfi tower supervisor called orf area manager and complained. When I received my relief briefing, I was told these 2 aircraft were talking to lfi. I assumed they were being separated.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FGT, ON PAR APCH, OVERTOOK SLOWER MLT IN FINAL APCH COURSE RESULTING IN LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION.
Narrative: WHEN I RELIEVED ANOTHER CTLR THE LOSS OF SEP HAD ALREADY OCCURRED. AN MLT WAS ON 5 MI FINAL, VISUAL APCH, ON LFI TWR FREQ. AN FGT WAS ON 7 MI FINAL, PAR APCH, ON LFI RFC FREQ. THE PROB WAS DISCOVERED WHEN THE FLT HAD TO GO AROUND AND LFI TWR SUPVR CALLED ORF AREA MGR AND COMPLAINED. WHEN I RECEIVED MY RELIEF BRIEFING, I WAS TOLD THESE 2 ACFT WERE TALKING TO LFI. I ASSUMED THEY WERE BEING SEPARATED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.