37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 926398 |
Time | |
Date | 201101 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.TRACON |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Golden Eagle 421 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Local Supervisor / CIC |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
[Airport was] departing and landing runway xyr; landing runway yx. Runway xyl [was] closed. [The] advertised runway in use was runway xyr. A VFR aircraft; aircraft X (a PA32); was departing runway xyr. [I] took a hand off from the south radar sector; aircraft Y (a C421) IFR on visual approach to runway yx descending to 3;000 ft. Aircraft X was issued a 160 degree heading climbing to 3;000 ft in accordance with facility procedures. There was a jet (a C560) with a release time that I was trying to comply with behind aircraft X. The 160 degree heading placed aircraft X 20 degrees off of the reciprocal inbound heading to runway yx. Aircraft Y was on a dog leg to runway yx. I became uncomfortable with aircraft X and aircraft Y on semi-converging courses. I issued traffic to aircraft Y and then instructed aircraft Y to descend to 2;500 ft abeam the carrot inside of a 3;000 ft MVA and turned aircraft Y 10 degrees to the right to ensure separation. The controller-in-charge reminded me of the MVA in the area. Subsequent review of the tarp data revealed aircraft Y was 1 mile east of the carrot turning northeast bound away and past the carrot when the aircraft began descending. Review also revealed that; had I let the aircraft alone or simply vectored aircraft Y without descending aircraft Y; the two aircraft would not have been a factor. I was attempting to ensure separation between the two aircraft. I preach to my own employees not to let hitting a release time lead them into a potential problem and I did not follow my own advice. The two aircraft were not a separation issue; but I put myself in a potential trap situation with the MVA. Recommendation: coordinate a different heading for aircraft X. Attempt to coordinate a new release time for the C560 if I couldn't make the time. Simply turn aircraft Y without descending the aircraft ensuring lateral separation and not both lateral and vertical.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Tower Supervisor described a near MVA separation loss when trying to comply with a IFR release time restriction; the supervisor noting he/she did not follow his/her own advise regarding allowing a release time to alter good decision making.
Narrative: [Airport was] departing and landing Runway XYR; landing Runway YX. Runway XYL [was] closed. [The] advertised runway in use was Runway XYR. A VFR aircraft; Aircraft X (a PA32); was departing Runway XYR. [I] took a hand off from the South RADAR Sector; Aircraft Y (a C421) IFR on visual approach to Runway YX descending to 3;000 FT. Aircraft X was issued a 160 degree heading climbing to 3;000 FT in accordance with facility procedures. There was a jet (a C560) with a release time that I was trying to comply with behind Aircraft X. The 160 degree heading placed Aircraft X 20 degrees off of the reciprocal inbound heading to Runway YX. Aircraft Y was on a dog leg to Runway YX. I became uncomfortable with Aircraft X and Aircraft Y on semi-converging courses. I issued traffic to Aircraft Y and then instructed Aircraft Y to descend to 2;500 FT abeam the carrot inside of a 3;000 FT MVA and turned Aircraft Y 10 degrees to the right to ensure separation. The Controller-In-Charge reminded me of the MVA in the area. Subsequent review of the TARP data revealed Aircraft Y was 1 mile east of the carrot turning northeast bound away and past the carrot when the aircraft began descending. Review also revealed that; had I let the aircraft alone or simply vectored Aircraft Y without descending Aircraft Y; the two aircraft would not have been a factor. I was attempting to ensure separation between the two aircraft. I preach to my own employees not to let hitting a release time lead them into a potential problem and I did not follow my own advice. The two aircraft were not a separation issue; but I put myself in a potential trap situation with the MVA. Recommendation: coordinate a different heading for Aircraft X. Attempt to coordinate a new release time for the C560 if I couldn't make the time. Simply turn Aircraft Y without descending the aircraft ensuring lateral separation and not both lateral and vertical.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.