37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 931514 |
Time | |
Date | 201102 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SKX.Airport |
State Reference | NM |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Commander 112TC |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | GPS & Other Satellite Navigation |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 30 Flight Crew Total 5450 Flight Crew Type 5200 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
1. AWOS at skx was inoperative. After receiving ATC clearance for the GPS 04 approach into skx; I announced my IFR approach to runway 04 on unicom. A pilot in the area said he was VFR at 500 ft over the rio grand gorge; with excellent visibility; but a snow cell was approaching with possible poor visibility. The pilot said his presence would not pose a problem for my IFR approach.2. I conducted the approach with a garmin GPS. During the approach; I had ground contact with limited forward visibility.3. My garmin 430 malfunctioned at about 1;200 AGL and about 4 miles from the airport. I could see the ground; but not the airport. I initiated a 'missed approach' by applying power; climbing; retracting my gear; and turning to the left 180 degrees.4. Called 'missed approach' on center frequency. ATC typically cannot hear below 10;000 to 11;000 MSL in that area (where I am familiar; from numerous flights every year). Another plane passing nearby confirmed our transmission and passed it on to ATC.5. Without a functional GPS; I was unable to locate the teloy intersection and hold there (which is part of the GPS 04 missed approach procedure).6. I maintained a heading of 220 degrees and climbed to 11;000 to rejoin V83 heading south (which I could identify on a separate VOR not attached to the garmin 430). 7. Around 11;000 I was able to speak with ATC. The connection was not good; and communications were not clear until I got further south. The controller questioned my not holding at teloy intersection for further instructions; I informed him about the failed GPS on approach. Eventually; after the situation was eventually clarified; the controller cleared me on V83 to santa fe airport; where I landed. 8. The GPS on the garmin 430 came back en route to santa fe airport; but the vos on the garmin 430 was inoperative. The next day I flew the plane from santa fe to skx and the garmin GPS again functioned normally; but the garmin vos remained inoperative. 9. Recently I had an additional electrical instrument installed; which -- along with humidity in the clouds -- may have produced this result. I will have this problem checked out.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AC112 pilot report GPS failure during GPS 04 approach to SKX in poor visibility. A missed approach is initiated but the procedure cannot be complied with without the GPS. Communication is not possible with ATC below 11;000 which further added to the difficulties.
Narrative: 1. AWOS at SKX was inoperative. After receiving ATC clearance for the GPS 04 approach into SKX; I announced my IFR approach to Runway 04 on UNICOM. A pilot in the area said he was VFR at 500 FT over the Rio Grand Gorge; with excellent visibility; but a snow cell was approaching with possible poor visibility. The pilot said his presence would not pose a problem for my IFR approach.2. I conducted the approach with a Garmin GPS. During the approach; I had ground contact with limited forward visibility.3. My Garmin 430 malfunctioned at about 1;200 AGL and about 4 miles from the airport. I could see the ground; but not the airport. I initiated a 'missed approach' by applying power; climbing; retracting my gear; and turning to the left 180 degrees.4. Called 'missed approach' on center frequency. ATC typically cannot hear below 10;000 to 11;000 MSL in that area (where I am familiar; from numerous flights every year). Another plane passing nearby confirmed our transmission and passed it on to ATC.5. Without a functional GPS; I was unable to locate the TELOY Intersection and hold there (which is part of the GPS 04 missed approach procedure).6. I maintained a heading of 220 degrees and climbed to 11;000 to rejoin V83 heading south (which I could identify on a separate VOR not attached to the Garmin 430). 7. Around 11;000 I was able to speak with ATC. The connection was not good; and communications were not clear until I got further south. The Controller questioned my not holding at TELOY Intersection for further instructions; I informed him about the failed GPS on approach. Eventually; after the situation was eventually clarified; the Controller cleared me on V83 to Santa Fe airport; where I landed. 8. The GPS on the Garmin 430 came back en route to Santa Fe airport; but the VOS on the Garmin 430 was inoperative. The next day I flew the plane from Santa Fe to SKX and the Garmin GPS again functioned normally; but the Garmin VOS remained inoperative. 9. Recently I had an additional electrical instrument installed; which -- along with humidity in the clouds -- may have produced this result. I will have this problem checked out.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.