37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 935626 |
Time | |
Date | 201103 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SFO.Airport |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A310 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 150 Flight Crew Total 4500 Flight Crew Type 1200 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 15000 Vertical 0 |
Narrative:
We were cleared the FMS bridge visual to 28R at ksfo. With both norcal approach and ksfo tower we heard a carrier X heavy jet (B777?) on the localizer to 28L. He was told to not overtake us. As we were angling toward the runway on the FMS visual; the carrier X came closer to us. Our captain asked tower if this was ok to land wingtip to wingtip. Tower replied 'yes.' within the next 5-10 seconds; we received a climb RA; a new voice came over tower frequency and told carrier X jet to go around. We elected not to follow the climb RA as the other aircraft was visual and was already climbing. We received a 'clear of conflict.' as far as we could tell; both aircraft were doing what they were told and were on course. The geometry of the situation meant that eventually we would converge and parallel each other without any spacing with respect to the runway. Our charts caution that operations within 500' might occur. It seemed norcal may not have provided proper spacing.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air Carrier flight crew described a wingtip to wingtip operations while landing at SFO that resulted in a go around by the adjacent traffic; the reporter's questioning ATC's simultaneous procedures.
Narrative: We were cleared the FMS Bridge Visual to 28R at KSFO. With both NORCAL Approach and KSFO Tower we heard a Carrier X heavy jet (B777?) on the LOC to 28L. He was told to not overtake us. As we were angling toward the runway on the FMS visual; the Carrier X came closer to us. Our Captain asked tower if this was OK to land wingtip to wingtip. Tower replied 'yes.' Within the next 5-10 seconds; we received a climb RA; a new voice came over tower frequency and told Carrier X jet to go around. We elected not to follow the climb RA as the other aircraft was visual and was already climbing. We received a 'clear of conflict.' As far as we could tell; both aircraft were doing what they were told and were on course. The geometry of the situation meant that eventually we would converge and parallel each other without any spacing with respect to the runway. Our charts caution that operations within 500' might occur. It seemed NORCAL may not have provided proper spacing.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.