37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 953208 |
Time | |
Date | 201106 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | MCO.Airport |
State Reference | FL |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B757-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | PFD |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | First Officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Speed All Types Flight Deck / Cabin / Aircraft Event Other / Unknown |
Narrative:
In the descent; we were cleared to 13;000 ft. Around FL230; center asked us to expedite descent through FL180. We were either in flch or VNAV with speed intervention. The first officer; as pilot flying; pulled power to idle and increased the selected speed in the airspeed window. He later added power to reduce the descent rate.the resulting speed increase was much faster than my reaction time. I called 'speed' twice; but it was too late. We experienced about a 5 KT over-speed for about 3 seconds. In retrospect; I should have pulled the speed brake handle full aft; but even that may not have prevented the over-speed in this case.while; as the captain; I take full responsibility for this event; I feel a major contributing factor is the flat panel display system [(fpds)]. Its compact and cluttered display of critical information seriously hampers recognition and response. Our older flight instrument system is a safer; more pilot friendly display with a stand-alone ADI sitting higher up on the forward instrument panel and not cluttered with airspeed and altitude data; along with larger; easy to read airspeed and vertical velocity indicators. Under less than optimum conditions; the fpds is counter-productive to safe and effective flight operations.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B757-200 flight crew experienced a momentary overspeed when asked to expedite their descent by ATC. The newly installed flat panel display system is cited by on Captain as contributing to the event due to its cluttered display of vital performance information.
Narrative: In the descent; we were cleared to 13;000 FT. Around FL230; Center asked us to expedite descent through FL180. We were either in FLCH or VNAV with speed intervention. The First Officer; as pilot flying; pulled power to idle and increased the selected speed in the airspeed window. He later added power to reduce the descent rate.The resulting speed increase was much faster than my reaction time. I called 'speed' twice; but it was too late. We experienced about a 5 KT over-speed for about 3 seconds. In retrospect; I should have pulled the speed brake handle full aft; but even that may not have prevented the over-speed in this case.While; as the Captain; I take full responsibility for this event; I feel a major contributing factor is the flat panel display system [(FPDS)]. Its compact and cluttered display of critical information seriously hampers recognition and response. Our older flight instrument system is a safer; more pilot friendly display with a stand-alone ADI sitting higher up on the forward instrument panel and not cluttered with airspeed and altitude data; along with larger; easy to read airspeed and vertical velocity indicators. Under less than optimum conditions; the FPDS is counter-productive to safe and effective flight operations.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.