37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 957537 |
Time | |
Date | 201107 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet CL65 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 150 Flight Crew Total 2400 Flight Crew Type 1100 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Event / Encounter Vehicle |
Narrative:
After completing all standard preflight procedures and briefings; the captain advised the ground crew that our parking brake had been released and they were cleared to capture. I contacted ground control who cleared us to push. The captain so advised the ground lead who appeared to check in the direction of both wings and then began the push. Within 5 seconds there was a loud bang and the aircraft shuddered. It was clear the aircraft had struck something. The ground crew lead was visibly upset. He stopped the aircraft; removed his headset without communication and called his crew to the front of the aircraft. I then called ground to inform them of the situation as we were in the active ramp area. It was not clear to me whether there was a wing walker present on the aircraft's damaged side at the time of push. The passenger door was opened and the captain left the cockpit to assess the situation and damage. He discovered the aircraft's left wing had struck a baggage cart and there was significant damage.once it was clear that there was no danger to the passengers and crew; we were towed back to the gate. I contacted operations to request a gate agent to attach the jetbridge and aid in customer service; and then called maintenance and informed them of the situation. It isn't clear if a wing walker was present on both sides of the aircraft at the time of the incident. However; a lack of communication between the ground crewmembers was obvious. Additional training might be considered for the ground crews as well as the use of dual wing walkers; as only one is required currently.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CL65 was either struck or struck by a baggage cart as it was pushed from the gate. The flight crew alleges that ground handling of aircraft at this station is routinely sloppy and non-standard and that better training and supervision is necessary to prevent such incidents in the future.
Narrative: After completing all standard preflight procedures and briefings; the Captain advised the ground crew that our parking brake had been released and they were cleared to capture. I contacted Ground Control who cleared us to push. The Captain so advised the ground lead who appeared to check in the direction of both wings and then began the push. Within 5 seconds there was a loud bang and the aircraft shuddered. It was clear the aircraft had struck something. The ground crew lead was visibly upset. He stopped the aircraft; removed his headset without communication and called his crew to the front of the aircraft. I then called Ground to inform them of the situation as we were in the active ramp area. It was not clear to me whether there was a wing walker present on the aircraft's damaged side at the time of push. The passenger door was opened and the Captain left the cockpit to assess the situation and damage. He discovered the aircraft's left wing had struck a baggage cart and there was significant damage.Once it was clear that there was no danger to the passengers and crew; we were towed back to the gate. I contacted Operations to request a gate agent to attach the jetbridge and aid in customer service; and then called Maintenance and informed them of the situation. It isn't clear if a wing walker was present on both sides of the aircraft at the time of the incident. However; a lack of communication between the ground crewmembers was obvious. Additional training might be considered for the ground crews as well as the use of dual wing walkers; as only one is required currently.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.