37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 978314 |
Time | |
Date | 201111 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna Single Piston Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 150 Flight Crew Total 5000 Flight Crew Type 35 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Conflict NMAC |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 75 Vertical 50 |
Narrative:
As we were on a 45 degree entry about to turn down wind for runway xxr aircraft Y passed immediately in front from west to east in the process of circling to runway yy. ATC had instructed us to follow aircraft X turning crosswind. I made two reports: 'aircraft X not in sight' and a little while later; 'aircraft X in sight'. I heard aircraft Y contact tower 'that they were on the VOR xx approach' and ATC called out my position to them and instructed the aircraft Y to remain at or above 1500' because of the C-152 in the pattern and our approach to the 45 degree entry to xxr from the southwest. When they indicated they were landing; they were instructed to follow us for right traffic for xxr. The aircraft Y then requested to circle to runway yy. I do not remember whether a clearance for that request was issued before or after the 'close encounter'. I do not remember the aircraft Y receiving any further call outs on my position or it acknowledging ever seeing us. I did make an announcement to ATC that the aircraft Y had just past in front within 50 feet and believe ATC replied 'follow aircraft X on downwind'. I feel that ATC should have kept the altitude restriction and instructed aircraft Y to start their circle well prior to the missed approach point and well to the south of the xxr traffic pattern and standard entry zone. Alternatively; we could have been instructed to look for aircraft Y and/or given a clearance for additional separation. (Times and altitudes are estimates)
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A VFR aircraft entering the pattern on a forty five entry experienced a NMAC with traffic inbound on an IFR approach and circling to land.
Narrative: As we were on a 45 degree entry about to turn down wind for Runway XXR Aircraft Y passed immediately in front from west to east in the process of circling to Runway YY. ATC had instructed us to follow Aircraft X turning crosswind. I made two reports: 'Aircraft X not in Sight' and a little while later; 'Aircraft X In sight'. I heard Aircraft Y contact Tower 'that they were on the VOR XX Approach' and ATC called out my position to them and instructed the Aircraft Y to remain at or above 1500' because of the C-152 in the pattern and our approach to the 45 degree entry to XXR from the southwest. When they indicated they were landing; they were instructed to follow us for right traffic for XXR. The Aircraft Y then requested to circle to Runway YY. I do not remember whether a clearance for that request was issued before or after the 'close encounter'. I do not remember the Aircraft Y receiving any further call outs on my position or it acknowledging ever seeing us. I did make an announcement to ATC that the Aircraft Y had just past in front within 50 feet and believe ATC replied 'follow Aircraft X on downwind'. I feel that ATC should have kept the altitude restriction and instructed Aircraft Y to start their circle well prior to the missed approach point and well to the south of the XXR traffic pattern and standard entry zone. Alternatively; we could have been instructed to look for Aircraft Y and/or given a clearance for additional separation. (Times and altitudes are estimates)
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.