37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 992012 |
Time | |
Date | 201202 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Bombardier Learjet Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Bombardier Learjet Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Departure Approach |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
I was training a developmental on the G scope. The developmental told a lear on the downwind to the airport that their sequence was another lear at 11 o'clock and 6 miles; 2 miles west of zzzzz. The lear on the down wind reported the other lear in sight. The developmental instructed the lear to follow the traffic; cleared visual approach to runway xx. After acknowledging the clearance; the lear pilot requested to be switched to the tower. The developmental switched the lear to the tower frequency. I then immediately told the developmental to call the tower and coordinate the visual approach because we could not ensure that the lear on the visual approach would be established on a 7 mile final per LOA. The tower said unable and that the 2nd lear was turning base early and following the wrong aircraft. Had the lear followed the correct traffic; coordination would most likely not be needed and separation would have been ensured.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TRACON Controller providing OJT described a confused sequence event and potential conflict when a Lear was cleared for a Visual Approach to follow another Lear on final; but cut in front of the straight in traffic.
Narrative: I was training a Developmental on the G scope. The Developmental told a Lear on the downwind to the airport that their sequence was another Lear at 11 o'clock and 6 miles; 2 miles west of ZZZZZ. The Lear on the down wind reported the other Lear in sight. The Developmental instructed the Lear to follow the traffic; cleared Visual Approach to Runway XX. After acknowledging the clearance; the Lear pilot requested to be switched to the Tower. The Developmental switched the Lear to the Tower frequency. I then immediately told the Developmental to call the Tower and coordinate the Visual Approach because we could not ensure that the Lear on the Visual Approach would be established on a 7 mile final per LOA. The Tower said unable and that the 2nd Lear was turning base early and following the wrong aircraft. Had the Lear followed the correct traffic; coordination would most likely not be needed and separation would have been ensured.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.