37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 995478 |
Time | |
Date | 201202 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ROC.Airport |
State Reference | NY |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft High Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Instructor Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 300 Flight Crew Total 16200 Flight Crew Type 2000 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
This flight departed in VFR conditions. It was an instrument training flight. The student pilot was initially in control of the aircraft. Navigation mode was GPS to runway 28 at roc. When we were cleared for the approach weather was VFR. Shortly thereafter; it went IFR and an IFR flight was filed in the air and we were cleared to the roc airport and I requested ILS runway 28 instead of GPS runway 28. The instrument trainee was still in control of the aircraft. As we were being vectored conditions went to complete IFR. The trainee was having a difficult time with both heading and altitude. I was directing him but he was slow to respond. He was going below the assigned altitude on final. I finally took control of the aircraft. We were given altitude alerts by ATC. At some point we were cleared to land. The runway threshold came in sight and we landed. The low altitude issue would have been avoided had I; as the instructor; taken control of the aircraft as soon as we entered IFR conditions. This was not a deliberate action on my part but under the circumstances I acted too late. The flight was becoming uncontrollable. The tower requested I call them upon shutdown. The lesson is as an instructor; take control immediately.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An instructor pilot reported that his instrument student pilot had difficulty controlling the aircraft on an ILS approach but he did not take control of the aircraft after ATC issued low altitude alerts.
Narrative: This flight departed in VFR conditions. It was an instrument training flight. The student pilot was initially in control of the aircraft. Navigation mode was GPS to Runway 28 at ROC. When we were cleared for the approach weather was VFR. Shortly thereafter; it went IFR and an IFR flight was filed in the air and we were cleared to the ROC airport and I requested ILS Runway 28 instead of GPS Runway 28. The instrument trainee was still in control of the aircraft. As we were being vectored conditions went to complete IFR. The trainee was having a difficult time with both heading and altitude. I was directing him but he was slow to respond. He was going below the assigned altitude on final. I finally took control of the aircraft. We were given altitude alerts by ATC. At some point we were cleared to land. The runway threshold came in sight and we landed. The low altitude issue would have been avoided had I; as the instructor; taken control of the aircraft as soon as we entered IFR conditions. This was not a deliberate action on my part but under the circumstances I acted too late. The flight was becoming uncontrollable. The Tower requested I call them upon shutdown. The lesson is as an instructor; take control immediately.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.