Narrative:

I accepted a radar handoff from ZHU on small transport X at 8000'. After finding the overflt strip on this aircraft I noticed that the assigned altitude on the aircraft should be 12000'. I asked the departure data position to full route the flight plan, and tell me the assigned altitude. They told me it was 8000', so I changed the 12000' on the strip and wrote down 8000'. I made a radar handoff to departure east and told him the aircraft was at 8000' requesting 12000'. The departure east controller climbed the aircraft to 12000' west/O changing the altitude in the computer, so ZHU did not receive an altitude change and they expected the aircraft at 8000', but it was at 12000'. I was charged with a system deviation because of my coordination with departure east. This I believe was departure east's fault in the fact that he did not make the amendment in the computer.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: IFR ACFT ENTERED ZHU AIRSPACE FROM IAH AREA AT WRONG ALT.

Narrative: I ACCEPTED A RADAR HDOF FROM ZHU ON SMT X AT 8000'. AFTER FINDING THE OVERFLT STRIP ON THIS ACFT I NOTICED THAT THE ASSIGNED ALT ON THE ACFT SHOULD BE 12000'. I ASKED THE DEP DATA POS TO FULL ROUTE THE FLT PLAN, AND TELL ME THE ASSIGNED ALT. THEY TOLD ME IT WAS 8000', SO I CHANGED THE 12000' ON THE STRIP AND WROTE DOWN 8000'. I MADE A RADAR HDOF TO DEP E AND TOLD HIM THE ACFT WAS AT 8000' REQUESTING 12000'. THE DEP E CTLR CLBED THE ACFT TO 12000' W/O CHANGING THE ALT IN THE COMPUTER, SO ZHU DID NOT RECEIVE AN ALT CHANGE AND THEY EXPECTED THE ACFT AT 8000', BUT IT WAS AT 12000'. I WAS CHARGED WITH A SYS DEVIATION BECAUSE OF MY COORD WITH DEP E. THIS I BELIEVE WAS DEP E'S FAULT IN THE FACT THAT HE DID NOT MAKE THE AMENDMENT IN THE COMPUTER.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.