37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1059781 |
Time | |
Date | 201301 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ATL.Airport |
State Reference | GA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb Initial Climb |
Route In Use | SID RMBLN7 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
After takeoff on 26L at atl on a rmbln 7 RNAV SID the tower called and asked 'you are in a right turn; correct?' I said that we were on the rmbln 7. The tower controller said to turn right to 300 degrees; which we immediately did. Just prior to the turn I noticed that the north wind had blown us slightly south of the magenta line. The wind was out of the north at 55 KTS. We maintained the 300 heading as we switched to departure. Departure asked if we saw the traffic at 10 o'clock. We did; and told him so. It was an rj; turning away from us. The controller said to maintain visual contact. He then asked if we had difficulty on the RMBLN7. I assumed that this was his way of asking me why we were on a heading. I replied that the north wind had caused a southerly drift; and hence the 300 heading. He then cleared us direct to rmbln.we should always engage the autopilot on RNAV sids. If the tower was concerned about a conflict; I would have appreciated an immediate instruction to correct; rather than start the conversation with a question (which wasted a few seconds before the correction was issued).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: The Tower was alarmed and issued a heading to an MD-80 departing 26L at ATL on the RMBLN RNAV SID when they drifted south immediately after takeoff while flying the charted 275 heading with the winds out of the North at 55 KTS.
Narrative: After takeoff on 26L at ATL on a RMBLN 7 RNAV SID the Tower called and asked 'you are in a right turn; correct?' I said that we were on the RMBLN 7. The Tower Controller said to turn right to 300 degrees; which we immediately did. Just prior to the turn I noticed that the north wind had blown us slightly south of the magenta line. The wind was out of the north at 55 KTS. We maintained the 300 heading as we switched to Departure. Departure asked if we saw the traffic at 10 o'clock. We did; and told him so. It was an RJ; turning away from us. The Controller said to maintain visual contact. He then asked if we had difficulty on the RMBLN7. I assumed that this was his way of asking me why we were on a heading. I replied that the north wind had caused a southerly drift; and hence the 300 heading. He then cleared us direct to RMBLN.We should always engage the autopilot on RNAV SIDs. If the Tower was concerned about a conflict; I would have appreciated an immediate instruction to correct; rather than start the conversation with a question (which wasted a few seconds before the correction was issued).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.