37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1070615 |
Time | |
Date | 201302 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.ARTCC |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Turbine Engine |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying First Officer |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 120 Flight Crew Total 15000 Flight Crew Type 2000 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 75 Flight Crew Total 13500 Flight Crew Type 2000 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
I was the pilot flying. While climbing through 14;000 ft we encountered chop. I advanced the thrust levers to mct so as to expedite our climb through the chop. When passing through 17;000 ft we got a single chime that drew our attention to the engine gauges. The number 1 egt was in the red band. This was accompanied by a fuel flow that was 600 pound/hr higher than the number 2 fuel flow. I immediately reduced thrust to the climb detent and engaged the autopilot. The egt stabilized below the red band. The fuel flow remained higher than the other engine. The captain began coordinating with dispatch and advising the flight attendants of the situation. I advised ATC of our need to return to [our departure airport]. We landed uneventfully. We came to a complete stop after exiting the runway. We asked the fire trucks to observe the number 1 engine for anything out of the ordinary. They stated that nothing seemed abnormal so we proceeded to the gate. During taxi the number 1 engine still had higher egt and fuel flow than number 2. We deplaned the passengers; spoke to some mechanics; obtained another aircraft; and departed on an uneventful flight.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An A320 encountered turbulence during the climb at 17;000 FT so maximum continuous thrust was set to expedite the climb which caused an EGT overtemp so after reducing thrust the flight returned to the departure airport for a precautionary landing.
Narrative: I was the pilot flying. While climbing through 14;000 FT we encountered chop. I advanced the thrust levers to MCT so as to expedite our climb through the chop. When passing through 17;000 FT we got a single chime that drew our attention to the engine gauges. The Number 1 EGT was in the red band. This was accompanied by a fuel flow that was 600 LB/hr higher than the Number 2 fuel flow. I immediately reduced thrust to the climb detent and engaged the autopilot. The EGT stabilized below the red band. The fuel flow remained higher than the other engine. The Captain began coordinating with Dispatch and advising the flight attendants of the situation. I advised ATC of our need to return to [our departure airport]. We landed uneventfully. We came to a complete stop after exiting the runway. We asked the fire trucks to observe the Number 1 Engine for anything out of the ordinary. They stated that nothing seemed abnormal so we proceeded to the gate. During taxi the Number 1 Engine still had higher EGT and fuel flow than Number 2. We deplaned the passengers; spoke to some mechanics; obtained another aircraft; and departed on an uneventful flight.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.