37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1100492 |
Time | |
Date | 201307 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | FO |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B757-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Flap/Slat Control System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
When selecting flaps 1 on approach to ZZZ the le slat disagree message appeared. The flap indicator showed less than flaps 1. We asked approach control for delaying vectors or a hold; so that we could do the checklists. We followed the QRH procedures which led us to a flap 20 landing with a vref of vref 30 + 30 KTS. Due to this high speed landing I declared an emergency. We finished the le slar asym checklist and the non-normal landing procedures and continued the approach. Landing was normal and passengers were debriefed as to the delay and the emergency vehicles. There had been two previous write-ups in the logbook for this aircraft for the same issue. The aircraft had been flown about 8 flights since the last repair for this issue; with no problems.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: The pilots of a B757 experienced a Lead Edge Slat Disagree problem on approach. After performing the associated checklist; they completed a successful landing.
Narrative: When selecting Flaps 1 on approach to ZZZ the LE SLAT DISAGREE message appeared. The flap indicator showed less than Flaps 1. We asked Approach Control for delaying vectors or a hold; so that we could do the checklists. We followed the QRH procedures which led us to a Flap 20 landing with a VREF of VREF 30 + 30 KTS. Due to this high speed landing I declared an emergency. We finished the LE SLAR ASYM checklist and the non-normal landing procedures and continued the approach. Landing was normal and passengers were debriefed as to the delay and the emergency vehicles. There had been two previous write-ups in the logbook for this aircraft for the same issue. The aircraft had been flown about 8 flights since the last repair for this issue; with no problems.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.