Narrative:

We were cleared for takeoff runway 28 at bwi. A single engine small aircraft was cleared to land runway 22 to hold short of 28. During our takeoff roll we heard tower ask the small aircraft if he was able to hold short. At that point we realized that he would not be stopping. We aborted our takeoff short of his position. Our speed was approximately 110 KTS (20 KTS below V1). Our decision to abort may have been delayed due to the uncertainty of the situation. Due to the angle of the intersecting runways it was difficult to see what was happening to the other aircraft. When we were far enough down the runway to get a good view of the situation it could be judged only from the first officer's side. Once the first officer voiced concern that the aircraft may not stop I aborted the takeoff. What prompted my decision most of all was the direct way that my first officer expressed the situation, absent of that there may have been further delay in my reaction. In this case I believe the first officer would have correctly taken control and initiated the rejected takeoff, a situation that would not happen with less experienced first officer's.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: LNDG ACFT FAILED TO HOLD SHORT OF INTERSECTING DEP RWY CAUSING DEPARTING ACFT TO ACCOMPLISH A RELATIVELY HIGH SPEED ABORT.

Narrative: WE WERE CLRED FOR TKOF RWY 28 AT BWI. A SINGLE ENGINE SMA WAS CLRED TO LAND RWY 22 TO HOLD SHORT OF 28. DURING OUR TKOF ROLL WE HEARD TWR ASK THE SMA IF HE WAS ABLE TO HOLD SHORT. AT THAT POINT WE REALIZED THAT HE WOULD NOT BE STOPPING. WE ABORTED OUR TKOF SHORT OF HIS POSITION. OUR SPEED WAS APPROX 110 KTS (20 KTS BELOW V1). OUR DECISION TO ABORT MAY HAVE BEEN DELAYED DUE TO THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE SITUATION. DUE TO THE ANGLE OF THE INTERSECTING RWYS IT WAS DIFFICULT TO SEE WHAT WAS HAPPENING TO THE OTHER ACFT. WHEN WE WERE FAR ENOUGH DOWN THE RWY TO GET A GOOD VIEW OF THE SITUATION IT COULD BE JUDGED ONLY FROM THE F/O'S SIDE. ONCE THE F/O VOICED CONCERN THAT THE ACFT MAY NOT STOP I ABORTED THE TKOF. WHAT PROMPTED MY DECISION MOST OF ALL WAS THE DIRECT WAY THAT MY F/O EXPRESSED THE SITUATION, ABSENT OF THAT THERE MAY HAVE BEEN FURTHER DELAY IN MY REACTION. IN THIS CASE I BELIEVE THE F/O WOULD HAVE CORRECTLY TAKEN CONTROL AND INITIATED THE REJECTED TKOF, A SITUATION THAT WOULD NOT HAPPEN WITH LESS EXPERIENCED F/O'S.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.