Narrative:

Received, copied and read back a clearance with instructions to fly an airway. Turned on course after takeoff. Center queried if I'd been given a 'maintain runway heading'. I had not. While departure was talking about this and calling the tower to confirm it (tower said I had), a turboprop twin, leveling out, crossed underneath us. I turned to pass behind him. Departure directed turn back on runway heading would have made the conflict worse. I believe that departure should have been more concerned with the conflicts than with who gave who what clearance. A turn away from traffic might have resulted in a collision. As it was, traffic was out of sight underneath for some seconds. Moral: standard error: tower or someone omits a part of a clearance and the error isn't caught on readback.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AFTER DEP REPORTER ACFT INITIATED A TURN ON COURSE WHEN DEP CTLR EXPECTED THAT HE WOULD MAINTAIN RWY HEADING RESULTING IN CONFLICT WITH OTHER DEPARTING TRAFFIC.

Narrative: RECEIVED, COPIED AND READ BACK A CLRNC WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO FLY AN AIRWAY. TURNED ON COURSE AFTER TKOF. CENTER QUERIED IF I'D BEEN GIVEN A 'MAINTAIN RWY HDG'. I HAD NOT. WHILE DEP WAS TALKING ABOUT THIS AND CALLING THE TWR TO CONFIRM IT (TWR SAID I HAD), A TURBOPROP TWIN, LEVELING OUT, CROSSED UNDERNEATH US. I TURNED TO PASS BEHIND HIM. DEP DIRECTED TURN BACK ON RWY HDG WOULD HAVE MADE THE CONFLICT WORSE. I BELIEVE THAT DEP SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE CONCERNED WITH THE CONFLICTS THAN WITH WHO GAVE WHO WHAT CLRNC. A TURN AWAY FROM TFC MIGHT HAVE RESULTED IN A COLLISION. AS IT WAS, TFC WAS OUT OF SIGHT UNDERNEATH FOR SOME SECONDS. MORAL: STANDARD ERROR: TWR OR SOMEONE OMITS A PART OF A CLRNC AND THE ERROR ISN'T CAUGHT ON READBACK.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.