Narrative:

This approach now brings aircraft too high to land on glidepath from MDA. I know it has a steeper glidepath; that is not the problem. The problem is that the glidepath puts aircraft too high at MDA to make a normal landing. The PAPI is all white. I was able to land only because I broke out 500-600 ft above MDA. The week before; the ceiling was close to MDA and aircraft had to go-around. Please have FAA flight check technicians call me; as the prior reports do not seem to be understood by company and union representatives.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: An MD-82 Captain reported that when flying the RNAV Runway 27 approach to SAN the charted glidepath (3.5 degrees) inside the FAF failed to place the aircraft vertically at a point from which a stabilized approach and touchdown could be accomplished. Per a later conversation with the First Officer of that flight the reporter learned the problem appears to have been resolved via discussions and subsequent actions between government; airline and pilot union representatives.

Narrative: This approach now brings aircraft too high to land on glidepath from MDA. I know it has a steeper glidepath; that is not the problem. The problem is that the glidepath puts aircraft too high at MDA to make a normal landing. The PAPI is all white. I was able to land only because I broke out 500-600 FT above MDA. The week before; the ceiling was close to MDA and aircraft had to go-around. Please have FAA flight check technicians call me; as the prior reports do not seem to be understood by company and union representatives.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.