37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1171767 |
Time | |
Date | 201405 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | MRI.Airport |
State Reference | AK |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft High Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Route In Use | None |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft High Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Route In Use | None |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Local |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 7.5 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Aircraft Y was originally told to go to runway 5 for a straight out departure; but he went to runway 23. Aircraft X was doing full stop taxi backs on runway 25. When aircraft Y was ready for departure; he was told to make a right downwind departure (standard is left due to runway 7/25 traffic) to keep noise away from the homes south of the airport. Aircraft X was cleared to land runway 25. I told aircraft Y to begin his right turn when he was west of runway 16/34 (as he was heading for another noise sensitive area); and he did so. Then passing the tower on runway 25 is aircraft X powering up as he did a touch and go; not a full stop as instructed. I told aircraft X to remain low through the intersection (as aircraft Y was just west of it at approximately 600 AGL) for traffic. I would guess they passed about 300 ft. Aircraft X was told to call the tower for a possible pilot deviation.after speaking to the pilot of aircraft X; he knew what he did wrong. His mistake almost caused a mid air. At mri we have issues with pilots doing what they want - vs. - Doing what they are told (i.e. Aircraft Y going to 23 - vs. - 5). FSDO needs to become more active in pilot education and if need be; pulling certificates. In today's world; I see us; the air traffic controller becoming more of an instructor than ever before at the GA level; as a large portion of GA pilots just do not know what to do; or say. Maybe due to lack of time in the airplane.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Controller reports of NMAC due to aircraft that was supposed to make a full stop elects to make a touch and go coming into close proximity of another aircraft in the pattern.
Narrative: Aircraft Y was originally told to go to RWY 5 for a straight out departure; but he went to RWY 23. Aircraft X was doing full stop taxi backs on RWY 25. When Aircraft Y was ready for departure; he was told to make a right downwind departure (standard is left due to RWY 7/25 traffic) to keep noise away from the homes south of the airport. Aircraft X was cleared to land RWY 25. I told Aircraft Y to begin his right turn when he was west of RWY 16/34 (as he was heading for another noise sensitive area); and he did so. Then passing the Tower on RWY 25 is Aircraft X powering up as he did a touch and go; not a full stop as instructed. I told Aircraft X to remain low through the intersection (as Aircraft Y was just west of it at approximately 600 AGL) for traffic. I would guess they passed about 300 FT. Aircraft X was told to call the Tower for a possible pilot deviation.After speaking to the pilot of Aircraft X; he knew what he did wrong. His mistake almost caused a mid air. At MRI we have issues with pilots doing what they want - vs. - doing what they are told (i.e. Aircraft Y going to 23 - vs. - 5). FSDO needs to become more active in pilot education and if need be; pulling certificates. In today's world; I see us; the air traffic controller becoming more of an instructor than ever before at the GA level; as a large portion of GA pilots just do not know what to do; or say. Maybe due to lack of time in the airplane.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.