37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1172069 |
Time | |
Date | 201405 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | OKC.Airport |
State Reference | OK |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Large Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 298 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Captain |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 248 Flight Crew Type 8000 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Incursion Runway |
Narrative:
After pushback and engine start from the gate at okc; I called ground control for taxi and they asked me if we wanted runway 31 for departure. I looked at the captain and we both agreed since it's a shorter taxi. I recall mentioning to the captain that 'I guess they opened runway 31;' since it was reported closed on the ATIS. I accepted the offer and we were issued a taxi clearance to runway 31. Once clear of the ramp; I pulled out the opc to recalculate for the new runway. Shortly thereafter; at the runway; I switched to tower frequency and we were cleared for takeoff for runway 31. I don't know why the runway was listed closed on the ATIS; but it did not seem unusual to us that it was closed and then reopened by ATC. Furthermore; both ground and tower control cleared us to the runway so we didn't question it. Finally; neither of us saw any markings to indicate that runway 31 was closed. I feel that we both acted in a safe manner in this case. I don't recall seeing runway 31 listed closed in any notams; and even if it was; I would assume that both controllers would be aware of their runway status. The next time; if there is any doubt; I will verify it with the controller.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: First Officer and Captain reported departing a runway that ATIS showed as closed but controllers asked if they wanted to depart on. Pilots accepted runway and later found out through company that it was closed.
Narrative: After pushback and engine start from the gate at OKC; I called Ground Control for taxi and they asked me if we wanted Runway 31 for departure. I looked at the Captain and we both agreed since it's a shorter taxi. I recall mentioning to the Captain that 'I guess they opened Runway 31;' since it was reported closed on the ATIS. I accepted the offer and we were issued a taxi clearance to Runway 31. Once clear of the ramp; I pulled out the OPC to recalculate for the new runway. Shortly thereafter; at the runway; I switched to Tower frequency and we were cleared for takeoff for Runway 31. I don't know why the runway was listed closed on the ATIS; but it did not seem unusual to us that it was closed and then reopened by ATC. Furthermore; both Ground and Tower Control cleared us to the runway so we didn't question it. Finally; neither of us saw any markings to indicate that Runway 31 was closed. I feel that we both acted in a safe manner in this case. I don't recall seeing Runway 31 listed closed in any NOTAMs; and even if it was; I would assume that both controllers would be aware of their runway status. The next time; if there is any doubt; I will verify it with the controller.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.