37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 119633 |
Time | |
Date | 198908 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : mco |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1500 msl bound upper : 1500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mco |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial landing other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 160 flight time total : 3860 flight time type : 160 |
ASRS Report | 119633 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : overcame equipment problem flight crew : declared emergency |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
On aug/tue/89, XY31 local, kyz flight leaving mco for gnv had a right engine fire warning light illuminate. Checklists were started and the tower was notified or the emergency (an emergency was declared). When power was reduced on the right engine, the warning light extinguished and did not come back on. The emergency was cancelled with mco tower and a normal landing was completed. There were no signs of fire or smoke. I believe situations like this could be avoided if the fire detection systems in the xx aircraft were better designed. The system has a history of false indications. This could prove disastrous when pilots flying the xx aircraft transition to other aircraft. A fire warning should always be treated as an actual emergency, but in the case of the xx aircraft, one should know and understand its fire detection system. This knowledge could prevent further problems.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLT CREW OF SMT ON CLIMB OUT HAD RIGHT ENGINE FIRE WARNING. REDUCED POWER, LIGHT WENT OUT. RETURNED AND LANDED. FALSE FIRE WARNINGS ALLEGEDLY COMMON TO THIS ACFT.
Narrative: ON AUG/TUE/89, XY31 LOCAL, KYZ FLT LEAVING MCO FOR GNV HAD A RIGHT ENGINE FIRE WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATE. CHECKLISTS WERE STARTED AND THE TWR WAS NOTIFIED OR THE EMER (AN EMER WAS DECLARED). WHEN POWER WAS REDUCED ON THE RIGHT ENGINE, THE WARNING LIGHT EXTINGUISHED AND DID NOT COME BACK ON. THE EMER WAS CANCELLED WITH MCO TWR AND A NORMAL LNDG WAS COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO SIGNS OF FIRE OR SMOKE. I BELIEVE SITUATIONS LIKE THIS COULD BE AVOIDED IF THE FIRE DETECTION SYSTEMS IN THE XX ACFT WERE BETTER DESIGNED. THE SYSTEM HAS A HISTORY OF FALSE INDICATIONS. THIS COULD PROVE DISASTROUS WHEN PLTS FLYING THE XX ACFT TRANSITION TO OTHER ACFT. A FIRE WARNING SHOULD ALWAYS BE TREATED AS AN ACTUAL EMER, BUT IN THE CASE OF THE XX ACFT, ONE SHOULD KNOW AND UNDERSTAND ITS FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM. THIS KNOWLEDGE COULD PREVENT FURTHER PROBLEMS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.