An approach controller addressed his concern that the tracks of non-FMS equipped aircraft utilizing ...

Narrative:

I was working arrival to dal. An SR22 called me and was too close to DR1's airspace. I turned him away and then asked feeder east if they had turned him off of the arrival (YEAGR1). They said no. This arrival places aircraft in too close of proximity to other people's airspace. Depending on where the aircraft starts his 'heading 310' as published appears to place him either too close to DR1's airspace or too close to dallas south's airspace.[we should] change this procedure and provide proper guidance for conventional aircraft to ensure separation from other people's airspace. A 'heading 310' published on the arrival 30 miles from the airport being thread like a needle through other people's airspace is not proper guidance for conventional aircraft. Put them back on some type of VOR guidance to ensure separation.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: An Approach Controller addressed his concern that the tracks of non-FMS equipped aircraft utilizing the YEAGR (Non RNAV) STAR (via a 310 heading from YEAGR) are insufficiently precise to avoid traffic conflicts with other controller's airspace as they approach the airport.

Narrative: I was working Arrival to DAL. An SR22 called me and was too close to DR1's airspace. I turned him away and then asked Feeder East if they had turned him off of the arrival (YEAGR1). They said no. This arrival places aircraft in too close of proximity to other people's airspace. Depending on where the aircraft starts his 'Heading 310' as published appears to place him either too close to DR1's airspace or too close to Dallas South's airspace.[We should] change this procedure and provide proper guidance for conventional aircraft to ensure separation from other people's airspace. A 'heading 310' published on the arrival 30 miles from the airport being thread like a needle through other people's airspace is not proper guidance for conventional aircraft. Put them back on some type of VOR guidance to ensure separation.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Attributes
ACN	1205219
Time
Date	201409
Local Time Of Day	1201-1800
Place
Locale Reference	DAL.Airport
State Reference	TX
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	SR22
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Cruise
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Function	Approach
Qualification	Air Traffic Control Fully Certified
Experience	Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 24
Events
Anomaly	ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict

An approach controller addressed his concern that the tracks of non-FMS equipped aircraft utilizing the yeagr (non RNAV) STAR (via a 310 heading from yeagr) are insufficiently precise to avoid traffic conflicts with other controller's airspace as they approach the airport.