37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 121451 |
Time | |
Date | 198909 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : grr |
State Reference | MI |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 2500 msl bound upper : 2500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : grr |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | landing other |
Route In Use | approach : straight in |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | landing other |
Route In Use | arrival other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
ASRS Report | 121451 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : far other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 0 vertical : 100 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Grr ATC tower is a level 3, radar approach facility. The day of the occurrence the radar was shut down for maintenance, so we were operating as a non-radar approach facility. Small aircraft X reported east of the airport initially, and was told to follow an medium large transport. Small aircraft X was later told to plan straight in to runway 26R, a parallel to the main runway 26L. He acknowledged and reported on final for runway 26R. The air taxi atx Y involved reported on a 5 mi final for runway 26L. A minute later he reported an small aircraft passing directly over him. Small aircraft X emphatically stated he was on final for runway 26R, not in sight by the tower. An small aircraft was spotted by the tower on final for runway 26L, small aircraft X again stated he was on final for runway 26R. I advised small aircraft X to look at the numbers painted on the runway, he said, sorry, I guess I am on final for runway 26L. At this point the crew in atx Y stated they were going to file an incident report.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A LNDG SMA LINED UP WITH THE PARALLEL RWY AND CONFLICTED WITH A LNDG ATX.
Narrative: GRR ATC TWR IS A LEVEL 3, RADAR APCH FAC. THE DAY OF THE OCCURRENCE THE RADAR WAS SHUT DOWN FOR MAINT, SO WE WERE OPERATING AS A NON-RADAR APCH FAC. SMA X REPORTED EAST OF THE ARPT INITIALLY, AND WAS TOLD TO FOLLOW AN MLG. SMA X WAS LATER TOLD TO PLAN STRAIGHT IN TO RWY 26R, A PARALLEL TO THE MAIN RWY 26L. HE ACKNOWLEDGED AND REPORTED ON FINAL FOR RWY 26R. THE AIR TAXI ATX Y INVOLVED REPORTED ON A 5 MI FINAL FOR RWY 26L. A MINUTE LATER HE REPORTED AN SMA PASSING DIRECTLY OVER HIM. SMA X EMPHATICALLY STATED HE WAS ON FINAL FOR RWY 26R, NOT IN SIGHT BY THE TWR. AN SMA WAS SPOTTED BY THE TWR ON FINAL FOR RWY 26L, SMA X AGAIN STATED HE WAS ON FINAL FOR RWY 26R. I ADVISED SMA X TO LOOK AT THE NUMBERS PAINTED ON THE RWY, HE SAID, SORRY, I GUESS I AM ON FINAL FOR RWY 26L. AT THIS POINT THE CREW IN ATX Y STATED THEY WERE GOING TO FILE AN INCIDENT REPORT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.