37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1220870 |
Time | |
Date | 201411 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZID.ARTCC |
State Reference | IN |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Medium Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Large Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Enroute Trainee |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Developmental |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Aircraft X was at FL350; landing lex. Aircraft Y was handed off to me from sector 95 at FL360. I descended aircraft X to FL240. When aircraft X was observed leaving FL350; I descended aircraft Y to FL350. The 2 aircraft went into conflict alert about 10 seconds later. Aircraft Y said he had an RA and was climbing. I called the traffic to aircraft Y and within 15 seconds aircraft Y said the RA was over and he was returning to FL350.the only recommendation I can think of is to make sure the aircraft are using the same rate of descent. The aircraft involved were comparable in descent profiles but aircraft X obviously was not maintaining normal rate of descent. With that being said; the rule in chapter 5 of the 7110.65 was applied correctly.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ZID Developmental uses the altitude leaving rule and ends up having a loss of separation.
Narrative: Aircraft X was at FL350; landing LEX. Aircraft Y was handed off to me from Sector 95 at FL360. I descended Aircraft X to FL240. When Aircraft X was observed leaving FL350; I descended Aircraft Y to FL350. The 2 aircraft went into conflict alert about 10 seconds later. Aircraft Y said he had an RA and was climbing. I called the traffic to Aircraft Y and within 15 seconds Aircraft Y said the RA was over and he was returning to FL350.The only recommendation I can think of is to make sure the aircraft are using the same rate of descent. The aircraft involved were comparable in descent profiles but Aircraft X obviously was not maintaining normal rate of descent. With that being said; the rule in Chapter 5 of the 7110.65 was applied correctly.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.