37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 122331 |
Time | |
Date | 198909 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : pvd |
State Reference | RI |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 7500 msl bound upper : 7600 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : pvd |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | enroute : direct |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Recip Eng |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 4800 flight time type : 1800 |
ASRS Report | 122331 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : insufficient time |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 0 vertical : 100 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
En route to pvd airport, receiving advisories from ocean approach. Small transport passed above us, climbing nwbnd, missing us by approximately 100'. We queried the controller, who merely sought to cover his error on the tape, by saying that he had called traffic twice and we had not answered. This was an outright lie as both myself and my first officer had been maintaining a continuous outside scan and listening watch on 127.9 MHZ. I identified the traffic as an small transport, a call to groton tower confirmed a recent VFR small transport departure. Despite our vigilant watch for traffic, the aircraft was able to approach undetected from our 1:30 position, partly because of the poor cockpit window design which tends to obscure viewing in the 10-11 O'clock 1-2 O'clock position. A call to ocean approach on the ground (telephone) provided a new answer. Ocean claimed traffic was nontransponder equipped and a primary target only so they did not call the traffic. Despite our vigilant outside scan and radar monitoring we were still nearly killed in a near midair collision. I do not have any suggestions as to how to avoid this type incident.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TRAFFIC ADVISORIES BUT HAS NMAC WITH SMT CLIMBING.
Narrative: ENRTE TO PVD ARPT, RECEIVING ADVISORIES FROM OCEAN APCH. SMT PASSED ABOVE US, CLIMBING NWBND, MISSING US BY APPROX 100'. WE QUERIED THE CTLR, WHO MERELY SOUGHT TO COVER HIS ERROR ON THE TAPE, BY SAYING THAT HE HAD CALLED TFC TWICE AND WE HAD NOT ANSWERED. THIS WAS AN OUTRIGHT LIE AS BOTH MYSELF AND MY F/O HAD BEEN MAINTAINING A CONTINUOUS OUTSIDE SCAN AND LISTENING WATCH ON 127.9 MHZ. I IDENTIFIED THE TFC AS AN SMT, A CALL TO GROTON TWR CONFIRMED A RECENT VFR SMT DEP. DESPITE OUR VIGILANT WATCH FOR TFC, THE ACFT WAS ABLE TO APCH UNDETECTED FROM OUR 1:30 POSITION, PARTLY BECAUSE OF THE POOR COCKPIT WINDOW DESIGN WHICH TENDS TO OBSCURE VIEWING IN THE 10-11 O'CLOCK 1-2 O'CLOCK POSITION. A CALL TO OCEAN APCH ON THE GND (TELEPHONE) PROVIDED A NEW ANSWER. OCEAN CLAIMED TFC WAS NONTRANSPONDER EQUIPPED AND A PRIMARY TARGET ONLY SO THEY DID NOT CALL THE TFC. DESPITE OUR VIGILANT OUTSIDE SCAN AND RADAR MONITORING WE WERE STILL NEARLY KILLED IN A NEAR MIDAIR COLLISION. I DO NOT HAVE ANY SUGGESTIONS AS TO HOW TO AVOID THIS TYPE INCIDENT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.