Narrative:

I was being vectored for the ILS runway 36R, when the controller came on and said to change to runway 36L. The visibility was 1/2 mi in fog. This was good enough to make the approach to 36L. The RVR to runway 36L was 1200' I was rushed by the controller to make the approach to 36L, even though the minimum RVR was 1800'. I thought to myself that if I got to dead heading and had the required visibility I could land. It turned out that the runway was in sight at 2 mi out, so I commenced with the landing. I assumed that at the dead heading, if the runway is in sight, it is ok to land. There was no argumentative communication with the controller.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SMA DESCENDS BELOW DEAD HEADING AND LANDS WITH LESS THAN MINIMUM VISIBILITY.

Narrative: I WAS BEING VECTORED FOR THE ILS RWY 36R, WHEN THE CTLR CAME ON AND SAID TO CHANGE TO RWY 36L. THE VISIBILITY WAS 1/2 MI IN FOG. THIS WAS GOOD ENOUGH TO MAKE THE APCH TO 36L. THE RVR TO RWY 36L WAS 1200' I WAS RUSHED BY THE CTLR TO MAKE THE APCH TO 36L, EVEN THOUGH THE MINIMUM RVR WAS 1800'. I THOUGHT TO MYSELF THAT IF I GOT TO DEAD HDG AND HAD THE REQUIRED VISIBILITY I COULD LAND. IT TURNED OUT THAT THE RWY WAS IN SIGHT AT 2 MI OUT, SO I COMMENCED WITH THE LNDG. I ASSUMED THAT AT THE DEAD HDG, IF THE RWY IS IN SIGHT, IT IS OK TO LAND. THERE WAS NO ARGUMENTATIVE COM WITH THE CTLR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.